There you go BigSteve - one remotely critical post
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 299)
Posted On: 03/30/2017 11:11:19 AM
There you go BigSteve - one remotely critical post and you have been deemed a heretic and publicly excoriated. Welcome to the group.
James - if you are going to go on a public rant and call people stupid, mock their intelligence, and so forth - could you at least use proper grammar and syntax (let alone spelling) so your point doesnt get lost in lunacy?
Addressing questions without answering them does not mean they have been answered and put to bed. Further - nowhere in your rant did you discuss actual revenues going forward or what are the drivers behind the delays in the aforementioned revenue streams. To date - the company simply hasnt executed on any of these revenue streams since you/IR came in to take the company through reconstruction. Period. Dress it up any way you want, deflect, mock, joke, whatever - the company has recorded zero revenues since the year that you've been aboard and you still refuse to provide guidance.
Once again - long term investors arent basing decisions strictly on balance sheets. They look at past history, capability, ability to execute, and how those can enable them to take a new/revolutionary idea/approach to the market successfully. The risk and reward is commensurate. You talk about all the debt prior when Bill just said the opposite - difference between debt and deficit. At least get on the same page. Those deficits are retained and can (will?) be used to offset future profit with respect to net income. Pretty straightforward. Several of us (many?) looked at the long term viability of TPACs businessplan with respect to niche that was carved out with NAVAIR cert in SE Asia market and heavily predicated on Bill's personal relationships in those areas (specifically China) and saw an attractive risk/reward.
If revenues didnt ramp up fast enough to drive cash flow and prevent OS increase - so be it. If ExIM changes at the political/state level changed and sent past M&A activity (and Korean loans) sideways @ so be it. That is part of the risk. Many accept that as such. However, your constant attacking of shareholders, misrepresentations, hyping a PPS prediction without providing ANY realistic plan to get there (and then blaming the failure on you were just passing information along), being resolute in your $13.5MM rev stream from BTL for 2016 and predicting 800MM OS (somewhere in that neighborhood) within 6-8 months of CC when you KNEW preferreds were converting en masse (as you/IR tweeted on numerous occasions while mocking shareholders for buying in 2016 and they should have known better - I saved the tweets), etc. Etc. Etc is NOT factored into general risk/reward scenarios for ling temr investors. UNLESS they are dealing with a typical OTC stock which this seems to have morphed into.
I never received your offer for my shares per Mag. What happened? You have my email.
You can continue to rant and lambast anyone that asks the simple questions but it wont change the fact that all your bluster, self congratulatory comments on MRVB/reconstruction performance, etc is NOT reflected anywhere in the balance sheet, PPS, or guidance. If it really was that robust - why not discuss it publicly? Oh yeah - the phantom buyback.
Want to shut us up...? Provide real results on the top and bottom line that are filed, recorded, and reproducible. Until then you are nothing but a slick talking street hustler with an MBA. Too bad they didn't teach you syntax and grammar when they made you the whiz trader.
If you were so confident in your results - you would debate publicly and addres the key issues instead of hiding behind twitter and cherry picking comments to frame your narrative.
James - if you are going to go on a public rant and call people stupid, mock their intelligence, and so forth - could you at least use proper grammar and syntax (let alone spelling) so your point doesnt get lost in lunacy?
Addressing questions without answering them does not mean they have been answered and put to bed. Further - nowhere in your rant did you discuss actual revenues going forward or what are the drivers behind the delays in the aforementioned revenue streams. To date - the company simply hasnt executed on any of these revenue streams since you/IR came in to take the company through reconstruction. Period. Dress it up any way you want, deflect, mock, joke, whatever - the company has recorded zero revenues since the year that you've been aboard and you still refuse to provide guidance.
Once again - long term investors arent basing decisions strictly on balance sheets. They look at past history, capability, ability to execute, and how those can enable them to take a new/revolutionary idea/approach to the market successfully. The risk and reward is commensurate. You talk about all the debt prior when Bill just said the opposite - difference between debt and deficit. At least get on the same page. Those deficits are retained and can (will?) be used to offset future profit with respect to net income. Pretty straightforward. Several of us (many?) looked at the long term viability of TPACs businessplan with respect to niche that was carved out with NAVAIR cert in SE Asia market and heavily predicated on Bill's personal relationships in those areas (specifically China) and saw an attractive risk/reward.
If revenues didnt ramp up fast enough to drive cash flow and prevent OS increase - so be it. If ExIM changes at the political/state level changed and sent past M&A activity (and Korean loans) sideways @ so be it. That is part of the risk. Many accept that as such. However, your constant attacking of shareholders, misrepresentations, hyping a PPS prediction without providing ANY realistic plan to get there (and then blaming the failure on you were just passing information along), being resolute in your $13.5MM rev stream from BTL for 2016 and predicting 800MM OS (somewhere in that neighborhood) within 6-8 months of CC when you KNEW preferreds were converting en masse (as you/IR tweeted on numerous occasions while mocking shareholders for buying in 2016 and they should have known better - I saved the tweets), etc. Etc. Etc is NOT factored into general risk/reward scenarios for ling temr investors. UNLESS they are dealing with a typical OTC stock which this seems to have morphed into.
I never received your offer for my shares per Mag. What happened? You have my email.
You can continue to rant and lambast anyone that asks the simple questions but it wont change the fact that all your bluster, self congratulatory comments on MRVB/reconstruction performance, etc is NOT reflected anywhere in the balance sheet, PPS, or guidance. If it really was that robust - why not discuss it publicly? Oh yeah - the phantom buyback.
Want to shut us up...? Provide real results on the top and bottom line that are filed, recorded, and reproducible. Until then you are nothing but a slick talking street hustler with an MBA. Too bad they didn't teach you syntax and grammar when they made you the whiz trader.
If you were so confident in your results - you would debate publicly and addres the key issues instead of hiding behind twitter and cherry picking comments to frame your narrative.
(9)
(1)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼