what i'm saying is one of the welland 3 .. who isn
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 390)
Posted On: 03/29/2017 4:31:25 PM
what i'm saying is one of the welland 3 .. who isn't even supposed to be posting
anything about P2O/PTOI .. posted today on the vehicle of choice for OTC
stock manipulation about the action of the atty who provided the shell in 2009
(today most recognize that prior utilized shells have inherent problems embedded)
i doubt most understood that in 2008/2009 .. and i have zero doubts if P2O's
founder was asked today whether P2O would come public via a R/M .. the answer would be HELL NO
but the point of today's *efforts* .. pertained to getting folks to sell PTOI shares
when i first saw the volume .. go from 1500 to 64500 .. my first thought was the
NT had been filed .. because i've actually been expecting this *effort* out of
this garbage .. it's not like they utilize new *efforts* .. rather tired and predictable ones
instead with nothing filed and me kept busy removing overlapping crap .. i read the few posts *there* and realized exactly what was done and when .. less than
20 minutes b4 *trades* got underway
this isn't new .. exact same pattern by non interchangeable (also a welland 3r)
who did stop posting but first showed *there* on 9.9.09 .. (LONDON CALLING)
did the same thing in Jan 2012 ..
that said .. today hopefully parted a few from the weak into stronger hands
as one long put it .. hopefully the box of rocks who whine incessantly there sold
out today .. i doubt it because whiners like to whine
bottom line is this .. once i posted *there* pointing out the obvious .. of the May 2016
data .. the UC ask done by NN of 10000 @ 045 .. *relo'd* back up the ask to
ETRF's UC ask .. which was an UC ask of a prior UC ask ..
CEs' have to protect 5c .. for beyond obvious reasons .. and for the most part
CEs' ability to part actual PTOI shares from INVESTORs .. has been an EPIC FAIL
for years ..
now that may change if RH can't execute and articulate .. but the investor who
posted here yesterday that you responded to directly .. is emblematic of many
P2O investors ..
lastly .. today's efforts netted a few longs .. about 90000 of today's volume
when the *crew* >> there >> goes quiet .. they are regrouping (aka RER)
which stands for regrouping efforts required .. as some of us have noted
there is nothing to post until P2O files .. and i'm not talking the presumed NT
en route due to RE Asset closing on 3.31.17 .. rather what comes after that
4kids
anything about P2O/PTOI .. posted today on the vehicle of choice for OTC
stock manipulation about the action of the atty who provided the shell in 2009
(today most recognize that prior utilized shells have inherent problems embedded)
i doubt most understood that in 2008/2009 .. and i have zero doubts if P2O's
founder was asked today whether P2O would come public via a R/M .. the answer would be HELL NO
but the point of today's *efforts* .. pertained to getting folks to sell PTOI shares
when i first saw the volume .. go from 1500 to 64500 .. my first thought was the
NT had been filed .. because i've actually been expecting this *effort* out of
this garbage .. it's not like they utilize new *efforts* .. rather tired and predictable ones
instead with nothing filed and me kept busy removing overlapping crap .. i read the few posts *there* and realized exactly what was done and when .. less than
20 minutes b4 *trades* got underway
this isn't new .. exact same pattern by non interchangeable (also a welland 3r)
who did stop posting but first showed *there* on 9.9.09 .. (LONDON CALLING)
did the same thing in Jan 2012 ..
that said .. today hopefully parted a few from the weak into stronger hands
as one long put it .. hopefully the box of rocks who whine incessantly there sold
out today .. i doubt it because whiners like to whine
bottom line is this .. once i posted *there* pointing out the obvious .. of the May 2016
data .. the UC ask done by NN of 10000 @ 045 .. *relo'd* back up the ask to
ETRF's UC ask .. which was an UC ask of a prior UC ask ..
CEs' have to protect 5c .. for beyond obvious reasons .. and for the most part
CEs' ability to part actual PTOI shares from INVESTORs .. has been an EPIC FAIL
for years ..
now that may change if RH can't execute and articulate .. but the investor who
posted here yesterday that you responded to directly .. is emblematic of many
P2O investors ..
lastly .. today's efforts netted a few longs .. about 90000 of today's volume
when the *crew* >> there >> goes quiet .. they are regrouping (aka RER)
which stands for regrouping efforts required .. as some of us have noted
there is nothing to post until P2O files .. and i'm not talking the presumed NT
en route due to RE Asset closing on 3.31.17 .. rather what comes after that
4kids
Quote:
You're saying there is a direct relationship between SMB posting and volume... That would appear to be selling volume. Are you suggesting that a shareholder or two actually sold based on that information or MM's made it appear as though selling occurred as a result of same?
(2)
(0)