Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Nanotech Entertainment Inc. (NTEK) Message Board

I actually enjoyed that portion of Dr. Foley's res

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 96897
(Total Views: 269)
Posted On: 03/26/2017 9:22:00 AM
Posted By: Karosin
Re: mtgkirk #74926
I actually enjoyed that portion of Dr. Foley's responses to my inquiries. I completely agree: it is much more reassuring that a CEO is being paid mostly in shares rather than having to sell shares into the stock market to meet his salary.

I have two problems with it though.

1) That information was stated in a shareholder letter. So, it can be assumed that it is more or less useless based upon the past history. It doesn't mean it is FALSE but it also doesn't mean it is TRUE. Many statements have been made in shareholder letters that have been either proven to be (in my opinion) fabrications either to sell shares into the market, were not done in the time span allotted, or were eventually discarded due to lack of organization and time.

2) Since the above statement cannot be proven true, at least by me or anyone else for that matter, what is the best way to SHOW shareholders that officers within the company have 'skin in the game'? To issue a FORM 4 and buy shares on the open market. The market cap is a measly $3 million. If such great things are going to be occurring in the future, why wouldn't you buy shares, especially since officers are more privy to the actual comings and goings of their company? It doesn't have to be a million shares but certainly SOMETHING would be more reassuring than nothing.

As far as to WHY officers will not buy open shares on the market, I have my own suspicions. I won't share them here.


(0)
(0)




Nanotech Entertainment Inc. (NTEK) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us