i'm sorry this eludes i did not agree with you
Post# of 43064
i did not agree with you .. may i suggest some basic business classes
RH filed a material event (8k) based on when he expected the sale to close
originally that was January
then (still with me) .. in the next process of RE transactions .. a discrepancy
was discovered .. that would impact the closing date .. which is why (most
likely) the next 8k filed by P2O may well pertain to the RE asset closing
and monies sourced
so presuming that closing date is 3.31.17 .. i would expect to see an 8K filed
in the 2nd Q .. tho' .. it is quite possible that it is included in the K .. (previously
addressed) which may result in an NT .. and again K being filed within 5 days
of that
this is a minor aspect imo .. that was used by morons to create noise there and here
can't help the uneducated
what i'm looking for out of P2O next is how the MOU/DA is handled
and input on progress towards what RH articulated in the 3 2016 Shareholder Updates
4kids
Quote:
Thank you for agreeing with me. From the time the offer is made to the time the deal closes 800 different things can go wrong. That's why I am saying why would Rick ever 8K that the building will be sold in January, 2017.
Like I said he has no idea what he is doing...
And BTW odds are I was the one who told that long about the septic problems and thats whats causing the delay.
You're welcome for my 100% CORRECT DD once again, I'm glad my DD got back to you!