I don't normally engage with those who play by you
Post# of 597
(Total Views: 290)
Posted On: 03/17/2017 11:39:47 PM
I don't normally engage with those who play by your rules, but okay, if you want to be my Barney kids friend, lets have a conversation. If you still want to be my friend after this, just come clean and tell us you've learned the error of your ways and maybe we can have a real conversation. You chose to make this public, so I'll respond in kind. Let me know if you want to take this private. Hangout doesn't mind either way - it's exactly this issue that got them to start this site.
I'll try to take this in pieces so nothing gets lost...
I'm not sure I get this, that you gave me credit ("...where credit was due..."
. First I've heard of this - in which post did you give me credit, other than referencing a post that I made for whatever your agenda was at the time...? I mean, where did you write something like "MFN made a good post here with valid info"? Not saying I feel the need for validation or for "credit" - I just put DD up on the boards, partly for friends/family/others (and partly to support MY investment). I never expected you to give credit, though I see from your post here that you're giving me some credit for opening your eyes to the value with ProGreen.
C'mon, man. Need I remind you that your post history is there for all to see? Give me a break. Think about it next time you start off with a new investment interest by trying to drive the price down for your loading. How about this (among the MANY bashing posts that you made):
Maybe you just forgot that these things can be seen in the post history (on PGUS and other message boards on iScam). Or maybe it's a classic case of cognitive dissonance with the associated denial and self-justification. I'm not surprised at all, as it's... human nature (to coin the phrase of your post here). With things of "human nature", I do give people second chances - call me a gullible sap, if you want, but I think people CAN change and improve, rise above. First step toward change is to admit it to themselves, and then openly to others: "My name is xxxx, and I used to do '...whatever' but I've changed my ways."
Address this, and I'll be happy to participate in your dialog. We could actually have good "conversations", I think.
I'll give you this right now - you've made several interesting contributions since those early days. But your "factual" opinion statements of recent days does not allow for "conversation" - the only one that I recall where you say it's 'your opinion' is the one regarding 100%-200% by year end: "You may get outside that range during the year but my opinion is what I stated." Most or all of the rest has been stated as if it's indeed incontestable fact --- which it is clearly NOT.
I'll try to take this in pieces so nothing gets lost...
Quote:
Still at I see. I gave you credit where credit was due and you still think I bashed to drive the price down.
I'm not sure I get this, that you gave me credit ("...where credit was due..."
. First I've heard of this - in which post did you give me credit, other than referencing a post that I made for whatever your agenda was at the time...? I mean, where did you write something like "MFN made a good post here with valid info"? Not saying I feel the need for validation or for "credit" - I just put DD up on the boards, partly for friends/family/others (and partly to support MY investment). I never expected you to give credit, though I see from your post here that you're giving me some credit for opening your eyes to the value with ProGreen. Quote:
All I did was question why things were happening the way they were. I was ridiculed and became the target of a lot of people to get me to buy or go away.
C'mon, man. Need I remind you that your post history is there for all to see? Give me a break. Think about it next time you start off with a new investment interest by trying to drive the price down for your loading. How about this (among the MANY bashing posts that you made):
Quote:
tigerpac
Tuesday, 08/16/16 04:00:22 PM
Post # 25761 of 34967
This company does enough to fabricate information. Seems like they have found enough willing kool-aid drinkers. There is a reason the stock is a penny. Company states that losses will continue for foreseeable future. Says additional financing of millions is required. How do you expect them to repay those "loans"?
I understand this is just a trade for many of you guys. Most will be gone in a few days. And whomever is holding the bag will have to restart the rumor mill all over again.
But to deny that more dilution is on the way is really sticking your head in the sand.
Maybe you just forgot that these things can be seen in the post history (on PGUS and other message boards on iScam). Or maybe it's a classic case of cognitive dissonance with the associated denial and self-justification. I'm not surprised at all, as it's... human nature (to coin the phrase of your post here). With things of "human nature", I do give people second chances - call me a gullible sap, if you want, but I think people CAN change and improve, rise above. First step toward change is to admit it to themselves, and then openly to others: "My name is xxxx, and I used to do '...whatever' but I've changed my ways."
Address this, and I'll be happy to participate in your dialog. We could actually have good "conversations", I think.
I'll give you this right now - you've made several interesting contributions since those early days. But your "factual" opinion statements of recent days does not allow for "conversation" - the only one that I recall where you say it's 'your opinion' is the one regarding 100%-200% by year end: "You may get outside that range during the year but my opinion is what I stated." Most or all of the rest has been stated as if it's indeed incontestable fact --- which it is clearly NOT.
(2)
(0)