I know the question of whether Krishna Kowgli is s
Post# of 22465
(Total Views: 367)
Posted On: 03/12/2017 8:26:49 AM
I know the question of whether Krishna Kowgli is still working for QMC has come up recently.
Reference PR
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nanom...84571.html
It looks like he's working with them through the university partnership. Check out his LinkedIn profile experience. His last two roles appear to indicate he's been working with/for QMC as a consultant and through the university.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kkowlgi/
The loss of one scientist who was there less time than the other scientists including Kowgli and Rebura doesn't indicate issues with QMC's capabilities. It indicates that one scientist didn't seem to get along with the rest of the team. Maybe that scientist wanted to do things differently than the rest of the team. Maybe there were personality conflicts or a few too many heated discussions that were a detriment to the entire team. I don't think we'll ever really know, but the departure in no way clearly indicates a flaw in the scientific process and QMC continued progress to commercial production status.
Notice that Kowgli is taking credit for the cad-free production process! Maybe he and the rest of the collaborative team are responsible for all the progress this past year.
Reference PR
http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/nanom...84571.html
It looks like he's working with them through the university partnership. Check out his LinkedIn profile experience. His last two roles appear to indicate he's been working with/for QMC as a consultant and through the university.
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kkowlgi/
Quote:
Texas State University
Research Scholar
Company Name Texas State University
Dates Employed Oct 2015 – Present Employment Duration 1 yr 6 mos
Location San Marcos, Texas
Researching on scaling synthesis of nanoparticles.
Consultant
Company Name Finsens
Dates Employed Sep 2014 – Present Employment Duration 2 yrs 7 mos
Installed and maintained flow reactors at client site and developed a novel process to manufacture cadmium-free semiconductor quantum dots.
The loss of one scientist who was there less time than the other scientists including Kowgli and Rebura doesn't indicate issues with QMC's capabilities. It indicates that one scientist didn't seem to get along with the rest of the team. Maybe that scientist wanted to do things differently than the rest of the team. Maybe there were personality conflicts or a few too many heated discussions that were a detriment to the entire team. I don't think we'll ever really know, but the departure in no way clearly indicates a flaw in the scientific process and QMC continued progress to commercial production status.
Notice that Kowgli is taking credit for the cad-free production process! Maybe he and the rest of the collaborative team are responsible for all the progress this past year.
(1)
(0)