Well, you prove my point with this statement......
Post# of 7802
(Total Views: 250)
Posted On: 03/09/2017 8:31:25 PM
Well, you prove my point with this statement.........
The sap has been claiming he knows the coins were found (who said it was 3 coins?), as does the POS company in court filings. The fact that's omitted from the research design might hinder progress with a potential recovery permit application. The FBAR wants ALL the information that has been obtained. You and/or others should get in touch with Kyle.
But what idiot of a CEO when copied on an email by the author of the research design doesn't alert alert the author and inform him about what he doesn't know? How freakin hard would that be?
This is what SFRX said through their OTC banned attorney in court filings. This was in direct response to one of the Amazing Blogger's post. And by the way, "such site" is Area 2, not Area 3 as the sap claimed.
See item 83.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/281084501/SFRX-v-Volentine
First of all, Sinclair's research design at that time had OMITTED the claim about the Captain's wife and the platters. That's not part of the research design. That's misleading at best.
Second, if it's publicly available Sinclair should have found it. The fact that he hasn't, if true, shows he's not being served very well by Kyle and/or the sap who claims it's CONFIRMED.
Let's see some breaking news like.........
SFRX confirms gold coins found on Area 2. Research design to be updated and submitted to the FBAR.
Quote:
OTHER POINT is of course our latest and greatest research design does not include this..
If it DID we Would be filing for a recovery permit already.
The sap has been claiming he knows the coins were found (who said it was 3 coins?), as does the POS company in court filings. The fact that's omitted from the research design might hinder progress with a potential recovery permit application. The FBAR wants ALL the information that has been obtained. You and/or others should get in touch with Kyle.
But what idiot of a CEO when copied on an email by the author of the research design doesn't alert alert the author and inform him about what he doesn't know? How freakin hard would that be?
This is what SFRX said through their OTC banned attorney in court filings. This was in direct response to one of the Amazing Blogger's post. And by the way, "such site" is Area 2, not Area 3 as the sap claimed.
Quote:
83. In actuality to the above portion of the post, there was readily available information to VOLENTINE that there was treasure in the form of actual coins from such wreck that is the subject of such site. As a matter of fact, it was one of SEAFARER's actual archaeologists who made recoveries on such site. And in fact there were three platters that were found on such site, which included the name of the wife of the very Captain of the ship being pursued. All such matters are were publicly available from the State of Florida records that were publicly available. The site in issue is a known site, far removed from the falsities that VOLENTINE posts.
See item 83.
https://www.scribd.com/doc/281084501/SFRX-v-Volentine
First of all, Sinclair's research design at that time had OMITTED the claim about the Captain's wife and the platters. That's not part of the research design. That's misleading at best.
Second, if it's publicly available Sinclair should have found it. The fact that he hasn't, if true, shows he's not being served very well by Kyle and/or the sap who claims it's CONFIRMED.
Let's see some breaking news like.........
SFRX confirms gold coins found on Area 2. Research design to be updated and submitted to the FBAR.
(0)
(0)