Human Rights, Defined Correctly By Paul Pauker March 2,

New Post Public Reply Private Reply Replies (0) Message Board

PoemStone cashclan #19403

Mar 5, 2017 at 7:32 PM 159

Human Rights, Defined Correctly
By Paul Pauker
March 2, 2017

Whenever a Republican president takes a position on human rights that differs from Progressive-liberal dogma, the media reacts with outrage. But regardless of whether the policies of any one president are just or unjust, the Progressive-liberal position on human rights is not supported by history or logic.

From the very beginning, human rights have been defined as natural rights in the United States.

In 1774, while meeting at the First Continental Congress, representatives from the colonies, including future president George Washington, explained that despite the oppressive acts of the British government, the colonists still had the rights to life, liberty, and property under natural law.

Then in 1776, while meeting at the Second Continental Congress, representatives from the colonies, including future president Thomas Jefferson, based the Declaration of Independence on natural rights, and proclaimed that securing these rights is the purpose of government.

Natural rights have four main features:

They are universal (they apply to everyone, everywhere);
They are unchanging (they stay the same, from generation to generation);
They are unalienable (they cannot be taken away by a government);
they are negative (they are the right to not be killed, the right to not be physically restrained, the right to not be robbed, and so on).

While natural rights are universal and therefore apply in every nation, the government holding power in one nation does not have a duty to secure the natural rights of people from another nation. For example, Mexico has the duty to secure the natural rights of the Mexican people; Syria, the Syrian people; et cetera. However, when a nation has permitted a foreigner to legally enter the nation, such a duty exists for as long as the foreigner is legally present in the nation. Nevertheless, there is no duty to permit a foreigner entry into a nation in the first place, and there is no duty to secure the natural rights of anyone present in a nation illegally. Consequently, the United States does not have a duty to permit either immigrants or refugees into the nation, and it does not have a duty to secure the natural rights of illegal immigrants (from Mexico or any other nation).

Now, while natural rights are unalienable and cannot be taken away by a government, these rights can be forfeited by an individual, but only when an individual violates the man-made laws of a nation (specifically, the man-made laws that are necessary to secure the natural rights of the people). In such a situation, a government can legitimately hold an individual accountable by depriving the individual of life, liberty, or property, depending on the facts of the case.

Still, while the natural rights of an individual can be forfeited by that individual, the natural rights of an individual cannot be taken away (or voted away) by other individuals, even if those individuals represent a majority of the people. During the Founding Era, Samuel Adams reiterated that "the great end" of government is the support, protection, and defense of the natural rights to life, liberty, and property. And reiterating another fundamental principle, he said, "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation."

Today, a few Progressives and liberals continue to cite the Declaration of Independence and sing the praises of the unalienable rights, while at the same time supporting man-made laws that violate those very rights. Most Progressives and liberals simply reject natural rights openly and outright.

In doing so, Progressives and liberals also reject the main features of natural rights; in particular, they claim that people have positive rights, including positive rights to government assistance. But this claim if false. The rights to life, liberty, and property are not positive rights to government services or benefits that assist the sustaining of life, or the exercise of liberty, or the acquisition of property. Moreover, a government cannot provide the positive rights demanded by Progressives and liberals without violating the natural rights of many other people.

Notably, the Founding Fathers held that natural rights are given by God, and this is the position that has been held for centuries by many leading minds. Additionally, some secular scholars have long held that natural rights exist, independent of God, rooted in the natural order that exists in the world. In contrast, Progressives and liberals accept the existence of a natural order in the world for everything (climate, plants, insects, et cetera) except human beings.

According to Progressives and liberals, rights are granted by government, not given by God (or nature), and rights are defined by government, if granted. Not surprisingly, these "rights" are defined in ways that impose Progressive-liberal ideology on everyone in the nation.

Natural rights are different. Undeniably, life is not an ideology, liberty is not an ideology, and property is not an ideology. Life, liberty, and property exist naturally, regardless of whether a government exists or whether a nation exists. As the French statesman Frederic Bastiat long ago noted, "Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place." And to repeat, the founding document of the United States, the Declaration of Independence, proclaims that governments are instituted to secure the natural rights of the people.

Indeed, every major injustice that has occurred in U.S. history, from slavery onward, has taken place in a situation where a level of government, federal or state, failed to properly secure the natural rights. Today, instead of binding old wounds, Progressives and liberals are ripping open new ones.
< >

Featured stocks: Coffee Shoppe
For conservative debate: "Keeping it Real"
Game Changing stock $SHMP

Newer

Older

Scroll down for more posts ▼

Top 10 Most Recent News Articles

TECNO POVA 8 Pro 5G: Blending Speed with Style

TECNO's Newest Launch: A Marriage of Luxurious Design and Performance This ain't just any phone—they've hitched a race car to your pocket. The TECNO POVA 8 Pro 5G Tonino Lamborghini Limited Edition makes a splash, promising to redefine what folks expect from a luxury-tier device, thanks to its endorsed partnership with the iconic Italian brand. But what's all this mean...

Sotheby's to Auction Largest Flawless Paraiba Tourmalines

Jaw-Dropping Gemstones Poised for Auction Glory The art of gemology isn't just about shiny rocks; it's a concoction of beauty, rarity, and, most importantly, value. And when the world's finest stones hit the auction block, it's akin to an epic performance in a long-awaited drama. On September 17, 2026, these precious Paraiba Tourmalines, fashioned by the adept hands of...

Tetragon Completes $50M Tender Offer; Shares Prorated

Unpacking Tetragon’s $50 Million Dutch Auction Move If you comb through the smoke-filled corridors of finance, you'll find the name Tetragon Financial Group pacing the latest tender offer rounds. They danced their way through a $50 million 'modified Dutch auction,' snapping up non-voting shares with a kind of ruthless efficiency that only seasoned market players can...

Carestream's Enhanced DRX-LC: Imaging Game Changer

Rethinking Long-Length Imaging with Carestream The medical imaging sector just got a shot in the arm with Carestream Healthcare International's latest leap in technology. The DRX?LC Detector is not just a fancy update — it's a full-on revolution for long?length imaging. Forget the old days of piecing multiple exposures together, because this innovation simplifies...

Crossware Joins Ingram Micro Platform for Wider Reach

Email Signature Game Changer Taps New Markets What goes around comes around, they say. Well, in the email signature business, it seems Crossware is putting that old adage to bed by building a highway straight through Ingram Micro's Xvantage platform. Yep, Crossware's shaking hands with Ingram to spread its email signature prowess to even more necks of the woods,...

Dahua Dives Deep into AIoT at IFA Berlin 2026

Dahua's AIoT Vision Unfolds in Berlin Forget the coffee runs and the all-too-dry boardroom discussions—Dahua Technology has taken the stage at IFA Berlin 2026 and they're not just singing the same old tune. They're blasting through innovation barriers with a mix of AIoT—the next-gen tech cocktail everyone’s buzzing about. Leveraging AIoT might sound like...

Parents Champion Meta's Online Safety Agreement

Any old-timer in the market game will tell you this: safeguarding the next generation runs deeper than just chasing profits. A recent poll by the Coalition to Empower our Future reveals something that ain’t too surprising if you’ve been paying attention. Parents all over the nation are nodding along to Meta’s new move to bolster online protections for younger folks....

NOVOSENSE's Bold Performance Amid Rapid IC Demand

Surge in Revenue Growth Marks a Milestone for NOVOSENSE Give a pat on the back to NOVOSENSE (HKEX: 02676), because reporting a robust 66.73% bump in first-half revenue isn't small potatoes in today's tech landscape. This translates to around $374.54 million rolling into their coffers, which is quite a spectacle if you're watching the trend of sequential revenue growth...

BMO Sheds U.S. Branches, Eyes Strategic Growth

Why BMO is Slimming Down in the States You know, when a heavyweight like BMO Financial Group starts shedding branches left and right, you gotta ask yourself what the grand plan is. In a move that looks more like a strategic dance than an abrupt U-turn, BMO's gotten rid of 138 U.S. branches, handing them over to First-Citizens Bank. We're talking outlets scattered from...

2026 AI Talent Study Reveals Growth and Gaps

Pushing Forward Yet Stumbling on the Details We've got a fresh scoop from the AI Leaders Council: They just rolled out their 2026 Corporate AI Talent Study. What's the big fuss? Well, they're tracking how companies are cozying up to artificial intelligence. Let's just say it's a mixed bag this time around. While almost everyone jumped on the AI bandwagon, only a scant 3%...