Human Rights, Defined Correctly By Paul Pauker March 2,

New Post Public Reply Private Reply Replies (0) Message Board

PoemStone cashclan #19403

Mar 5, 2017 at 7:32 PM 164

Human Rights, Defined Correctly
By Paul Pauker
March 2, 2017

Whenever a Republican president takes a position on human rights that differs from Progressive-liberal dogma, the media reacts with outrage. But regardless of whether the policies of any one president are just or unjust, the Progressive-liberal position on human rights is not supported by history or logic.

From the very beginning, human rights have been defined as natural rights in the United States.

In 1774, while meeting at the First Continental Congress, representatives from the colonies, including future president George Washington, explained that despite the oppressive acts of the British government, the colonists still had the rights to life, liberty, and property under natural law.

Then in 1776, while meeting at the Second Continental Congress, representatives from the colonies, including future president Thomas Jefferson, based the Declaration of Independence on natural rights, and proclaimed that securing these rights is the purpose of government.

Natural rights have four main features:

They are universal (they apply to everyone, everywhere);
They are unchanging (they stay the same, from generation to generation);
They are unalienable (they cannot be taken away by a government);
they are negative (they are the right to not be killed, the right to not be physically restrained, the right to not be robbed, and so on).

While natural rights are universal and therefore apply in every nation, the government holding power in one nation does not have a duty to secure the natural rights of people from another nation. For example, Mexico has the duty to secure the natural rights of the Mexican people; Syria, the Syrian people; et cetera. However, when a nation has permitted a foreigner to legally enter the nation, such a duty exists for as long as the foreigner is legally present in the nation. Nevertheless, there is no duty to permit a foreigner entry into a nation in the first place, and there is no duty to secure the natural rights of anyone present in a nation illegally. Consequently, the United States does not have a duty to permit either immigrants or refugees into the nation, and it does not have a duty to secure the natural rights of illegal immigrants (from Mexico or any other nation).

Now, while natural rights are unalienable and cannot be taken away by a government, these rights can be forfeited by an individual, but only when an individual violates the man-made laws of a nation (specifically, the man-made laws that are necessary to secure the natural rights of the people). In such a situation, a government can legitimately hold an individual accountable by depriving the individual of life, liberty, or property, depending on the facts of the case.

Still, while the natural rights of an individual can be forfeited by that individual, the natural rights of an individual cannot be taken away (or voted away) by other individuals, even if those individuals represent a majority of the people. During the Founding Era, Samuel Adams reiterated that "the great end" of government is the support, protection, and defense of the natural rights to life, liberty, and property. And reiterating another fundamental principle, he said, "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation."

Today, a few Progressives and liberals continue to cite the Declaration of Independence and sing the praises of the unalienable rights, while at the same time supporting man-made laws that violate those very rights. Most Progressives and liberals simply reject natural rights openly and outright.

In doing so, Progressives and liberals also reject the main features of natural rights; in particular, they claim that people have positive rights, including positive rights to government assistance. But this claim if false. The rights to life, liberty, and property are not positive rights to government services or benefits that assist the sustaining of life, or the exercise of liberty, or the acquisition of property. Moreover, a government cannot provide the positive rights demanded by Progressives and liberals without violating the natural rights of many other people.

Notably, the Founding Fathers held that natural rights are given by God, and this is the position that has been held for centuries by many leading minds. Additionally, some secular scholars have long held that natural rights exist, independent of God, rooted in the natural order that exists in the world. In contrast, Progressives and liberals accept the existence of a natural order in the world for everything (climate, plants, insects, et cetera) except human beings.

According to Progressives and liberals, rights are granted by government, not given by God (or nature), and rights are defined by government, if granted. Not surprisingly, these "rights" are defined in ways that impose Progressive-liberal ideology on everyone in the nation.

Natural rights are different. Undeniably, life is not an ideology, liberty is not an ideology, and property is not an ideology. Life, liberty, and property exist naturally, regardless of whether a government exists or whether a nation exists. As the French statesman Frederic Bastiat long ago noted, "Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place." And to repeat, the founding document of the United States, the Declaration of Independence, proclaims that governments are instituted to secure the natural rights of the people.

Indeed, every major injustice that has occurred in U.S. history, from slavery onward, has taken place in a situation where a level of government, federal or state, failed to properly secure the natural rights. Today, instead of binding old wounds, Progressives and liberals are ripping open new ones.
< >

Featured stocks: Coffee Shoppe
For conservative debate: "Keeping it Real"
Game Changing stock $SHMP

Newer

Older

Scroll down for more posts ▼

Top 10 Most Recent News Articles

ICEYE's Wildfire Intelligence: A Game-Changer with OroraTech

Wildfire Intelligence Gets a Boost from Space If you think keeping tabs on wildfires is just another task for dusty old fire towers, think again. The satellite game is changing up the field in a monumental way with ICEYE and OroraTech teaming up to bring a sharper eye to wildfire monitoring. With the integration of ICEYE’s SAR (Synthetic Aperture Radar) capabilities and...

Amcor's Q3 2026 Results Loom: What's at Stake?

Anticipation Builds for Amcor's Q3 2026 Financials Well, here we are again, staring down the barrel of another quarterly earnings report from Amcor plc (NYSE: AMCR). They've circled November 4th, 2026, in red on their calendars to dish out the numbers after the U.S. market's last bell rings. Investors, analysts, and the peanut gallery will be tuning in, and why not? At a...

Dr. Vivek Subbiah Leads NYU Langone's Cancer Programs

Cancer Care Takes a Leap with New Leadership The shuffle in the leadership ranks within the hallowed halls of NYU Langone's Perlmutter Cancer Center signals yet another step forward in the wild race against cancer. As of November 1, Vivek Subbiah, MD, is grabbing the reins over at the Early-Phase Drug Development and Rare Cancer Programs. This isn’t your average mundane...

Cocoa Market Set to Reach $216.42B by 2031

The Sweet Path of Growth Chocolate's got a new aroma wafting over the market, and it's nothing to sniff at. We're looking at a global chocolate bonanza rocketing towards USD 216.42 billion by the time we wrap up 2031. From 2026's USD 178.33 billion, that's quite a leap, tracking an annual growth rate of about 3.9%. If you've got a sweet tooth for numbers, you're not...

Unpacking the Sonic NEXT S13: A Toolbox Evolution

An All-in-One Solution Rolls In Listen up, gearheads and wrench-turners. Sonic Tools USA isn’t messing around with their newest release, the Sonic NEXT S13 toolbox. If you're tired of wrestling stubborn storage or losing track of your tools, this might just be what the shop ordered. Built to endure the tough grind of workshops from aviation to auto repair, the S13 is...

When Families Should Consider Life Insurance Plans

Let’s talk about why life insurance isn’t just for those walking around with gray hair. K.D. the Insurance Queen from Centennial, Colorado, dishes out the clearest advice on when and why families ought to have it in their arsenal. A New Mindset on Life Insurance Some folks out there think life insurance is something you ponder in your twilight years. But here’s the...

Bambu Lab Shakes Up 3D Printing with Massive Discounts

Price Cuts Bring 3D Printing Mainstream Here's the deal—3D printing used to be the domain of the tech-savvy elite, akin to those early computer geeks holed up in garages. But now? Bambu Lab is throwing open those doors with its Black Friday and Cyber Monday specials, slashing prices like a man on a mission. They're bringing an entire technological leap into our hands,...

Supermicro Unleashes Liquid-Cooled AI Masterpiece

The Shift to Liquid-Cooled AI With AI ramping up faster than a caffeinated day trader, it's no wonder Supermicro is getting into the liquid-cooled game with their swanky new NVIDIA Vera CPU rack—a real game-changer for clunky data centers. Built for today's over-the-top agentic AI, this rack isn't just some flashy new gizmo. It's 100% liquid-cooled and ready to handle...

Workday's $2.5B Notes Move: What's the Play?

Workday's Strategic Financial Maneuver When a company like Workday starts shaking the trees for $2.5 billion through a senior notes offering, you better believe traders like me are perking up and paying attention. We're talking a registered public offering, no less, which isn't peanuts. With such a substantial move, it's clear Workday (NASDAQ: WDAY) is setting its sights...

Direct Digital's Bold Exit: Delists from Nasdaq

Delisting Drama: Navigating Direct Digital's Market Move Looks like Direct Digital Holdings is getting caught up in the whirlwind of delisting and deregistering its Class A common stock from the Nasdaq. This move isn't just about hopping off a big exchange—it’s a whole new set of dance steps in the market. Timing and Mechanics of the Departure They’ve set their...