You mean when I call folks names like SCaM, or Co
Post# of 7802
(Total Views: 206)
Posted On: 03/04/2017 5:22:03 PM
Re: northofadollar #3099
You mean when I call folks names like SCaM, or Convict? Oh wait, that wasn't me. But I was being called names before I came to this board. When I got here, Huffman's inner circle was waiting. I was told something to the effect that this board was different and there has been every type of intimidation tactic employed to try and get me go away.
If you don't know this but this is all a game to Kyle, Huffman, and the rest of the Dumpling Gang. I've referred to them as Otis and Fudd simply to play along. In fact, Otis invited me to the party. He and Kyle have threatened to sue but to date have failed to deliver.
Others, including Kyle through Cliff Hunt have said shareholders were considering suing, but nothing has come of that.
Coat tail said, "I must know my days are numbered" recently, so I assume that's either another legal threat but maybe he/she has other plans. Whatever.
Now when I made a reference to the notion something must be going on.....hence the volume and price hike, as YOU suggested, I thought that was an idiotic statement because that suggestion meant someone knew something NON PUBLIC and was buying based on that NON PUBLIC information, which would be ILLEGAL. Even when I explained my comments you doubled down on your assertion, which you have every right to do. Just as I have a right to criticize that assertion.
For someone who claims they are all for free speech, it would seem the lawsuit SFRX filed should turn your stomach. They LIED repeatedly in their complaint and had Judge Cook not stopped them in their tracks with the Judgment I have no doubt they would have continued their scare tactics with others, including me by filing more lawsuits. I think Judge Stephens putting Huffman is his place and telling him basically SFRX can't win also put a stop to their BS.
The claim the Defendant made the share price drop is beyond bogus. Further, the Defendant has been proven right on several fronts. He actually trusted Kyle and was an investor. The Ad Agency claimed they had an 80/20 agreement in place, among other things that were FALSE, and we're even making fun of the fact he lost his son in a motor cycle accident. And you want to suggest I'm sick?
Get a grip. You're selective outrage is beyond laughable and noted.
If you don't know this but this is all a game to Kyle, Huffman, and the rest of the Dumpling Gang. I've referred to them as Otis and Fudd simply to play along. In fact, Otis invited me to the party. He and Kyle have threatened to sue but to date have failed to deliver.
Others, including Kyle through Cliff Hunt have said shareholders were considering suing, but nothing has come of that.
Coat tail said, "I must know my days are numbered" recently, so I assume that's either another legal threat but maybe he/she has other plans. Whatever.
Now when I made a reference to the notion something must be going on.....hence the volume and price hike, as YOU suggested, I thought that was an idiotic statement because that suggestion meant someone knew something NON PUBLIC and was buying based on that NON PUBLIC information, which would be ILLEGAL. Even when I explained my comments you doubled down on your assertion, which you have every right to do. Just as I have a right to criticize that assertion.
For someone who claims they are all for free speech, it would seem the lawsuit SFRX filed should turn your stomach. They LIED repeatedly in their complaint and had Judge Cook not stopped them in their tracks with the Judgment I have no doubt they would have continued their scare tactics with others, including me by filing more lawsuits. I think Judge Stephens putting Huffman is his place and telling him basically SFRX can't win also put a stop to their BS.
The claim the Defendant made the share price drop is beyond bogus. Further, the Defendant has been proven right on several fronts. He actually trusted Kyle and was an investor. The Ad Agency claimed they had an 80/20 agreement in place, among other things that were FALSE, and we're even making fun of the fact he lost his son in a motor cycle accident. And you want to suggest I'm sick?
Get a grip. You're selective outrage is beyond laughable and noted.
(0)
(0)