Human Rights, Defined Correctly By Paul Pauker March 2,

New Post Public Reply Private Reply Replies (0) Message Board

Mar 2, 2017 at 4:16 PM 114

Human Rights, Defined Correctly
By Paul Pauker
March 2, 2017

Whenever a Republican president takes a position on human rights that differs from Progressive-liberal dogma, the media reacts with outrage. But regardless of whether the policies of any one president are just or unjust, the Progressive-liberal position on human rights is not supported by history or logic.

From the very beginning, human rights have been defined as natural rights in the United States.

In 1774, while meeting at the First Continental Congress, representatives from the colonies, including future president George Washington, explained that despite the oppressive acts of the British government, the colonists still had the rights to life, liberty, and property under natural law.

Then in 1776, while meeting at the Second Continental Congress, representatives from the colonies, including future president Thomas Jefferson, based the Declaration of Independence on natural rights, and proclaimed that securing these rights is the purpose of government.

Natural rights have four main features:

They are universal (they apply to everyone, everywhere);
They are unchanging (they stay the same, from generation to generation);
They are unalienable (they cannot be taken away by a government);
they are negative (they are the right to not be killed, the right to not be physically restrained, the right to not be robbed, and so on).

While natural rights are universal and therefore apply in every nation, the government holding power in one nation does not have a duty to secure the natural rights of people from another nation. For example, Mexico has the duty to secure the natural rights of the Mexican people; Syria, the Syrian people; et cetera. However, when a nation has permitted a foreigner to legally enter the nation, such a duty exists for as long as the foreigner is legally present in the nation. Nevertheless, there is no duty to permit a foreigner entry into a nation in the first place, and there is no duty to secure the natural rights of anyone present in a nation illegally. Consequently, the United States does not have a duty to permit either immigrants or refugees into the nation, and it does not have a duty to secure the natural rights of illegal immigrants (from Mexico or any other nation).

Now, while natural rights are unalienable and cannot be taken away by a government, these rights can be forfeited by an individual, but only when an individual violates the man-made laws of a nation (specifically, the man-made laws that are necessary to secure the natural rights of the people). In such a situation, a government can legitimately hold an individual accountable by depriving the individual of life, liberty, or property, depending on the facts of the case.

Still, while the natural rights of an individual can be forfeited by that individual, the natural rights of an individual cannot be taken away (or voted away) by other individuals, even if those individuals represent a majority of the people. During the Founding Era, Samuel Adams reiterated that "the great end" of government is the support, protection, and defense of the natural rights to life, liberty, and property. And reiterating another fundamental principle, he said, "If men through fear, fraud or mistake, should in terms renounce and give up any essential natural right, the eternal law of reason and the great end of society, would absolutely vacate such renunciation."

Today, a few Progressives and liberals continue to cite the Declaration of Independence and sing the praises of the unalienable rights, while at the same time supporting man-made laws that violate those very rights. Most Progressives and liberals simply reject natural rights openly and outright.

In doing so, Progressives and liberals also reject the main features of natural rights; in particular, they claim that people have positive rights, including positive rights to government assistance. But this claim if false. The rights to life, liberty, and property are not positive rights to government services or benefits that assist the sustaining of life, or the exercise of liberty, or the acquisition of property. Moreover, a government cannot provide the positive rights demanded by Progressives and liberals without violating the natural rights of many other people.

Notably, the Founding Fathers held that natural rights are given by God, and this is the position that has been held for centuries by many leading minds. Additionally, some secular scholars have long held that natural rights exist, independent of God, rooted in the natural order that exists in the world. In contrast, Progressives and liberals accept the existence of a natural order in the world for everything (climate, plants, insects, et cetera) except human beings.

According to Progressives and liberals, rights are granted by government, not given by God (or nature), and rights are defined by government, if granted. Not surprisingly, these "rights" are defined in ways that impose Progressive-liberal ideology on everyone in the nation.

Natural rights are different. Undeniably, life is not an ideology, liberty is not an ideology, and property is not an ideology. Life, liberty, and property exist naturally, regardless of whether a government exists or whether a nation exists. As the French statesman Frederic Bastiat long ago noted, "Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place." And to repeat, the founding document of the United States, the Declaration of Independence, proclaims that governments are instituted to secure the natural rights of the people.

Indeed, every major injustice that has occurred in U.S. history, from slavery onward, has taken place in a situation where a level of government, federal or state, failed to properly secure the natural rights. Today, instead of binding old wounds, Progressives and liberals are ripping open new ones.

Featured stocks: Coffee Shoppe
For conservative debate: "Keeping it Real"
Game Changing stock $SHMP

Newer

Older

Scroll down for more posts ▼

Top 10 Most Recent News Articles

Austin PostalAnnex Changes Hands After 19 Years

A Seamless Transition in Austin's PostalAnnex Legacy You know when a business digs its roots deep, becoming more than just a place but a part of the community fabric? That's what’s playing out at the PostalAnnex on W Parmer Lane, Austin. After nearly two decades, this battered yet steadfast hub of office and shipping services is swapping hands, all in the name of...

ASCEND® Cladding Unveils New Profiles & Texture Variety

New Options for Creative Home Exteriors Amid today's housing market rollercoaster, a sprinkle of bold innovation in building materials can make a statement—and that's precisely what Associated Materials Innovations (AMI) is banking on with their latest beef-up in the ASCEND® Composite Cladding lineup. Introduced out of Cuyahoga Falls on Sept. 8, 2026, this expansion...

Innventure Faces Major Lawsuit Amidst Market Turmoil

The Plot Thickens with Innventure's DarkNX Project Buckle up, fellow market sling-riders; the Innventure tale is a rocky one for the books. Imagine this: You’ve plunked down your hard-earned cash on Innventure Inc. (NASDAQ: INV), lured by their glowing pronouncements about a supposed golden egg project, the Accelsius DarkNX data-center deal. A big talk about...

Goodwill's ReThink Fashion: Textiles to Runway Art

Transforming Old to New on the Runway Right when you think fashion's all about the next shiny thing, here comes Goodwill of Delaware & Delaware County flipping the script. Their ReThink Fashion Show - the ECO Edit teaches us a thing or two about what giving old clothes a new life truly means. It's not just about tossing a used tee onto a catwalk but a whole rebirth...

MADD, Uber Rally at Capital Invitational for Safe Choices

Driving Change at the Capital Invitational Let's talk about a powerhouse collaboration aiming to do more than just thrill basketball fans. We're looking at MADD Sports, Uber, and the Capital Invitational joining forces at The St. James in Springfield, Virginia, on December 10, 2026. This is not your average sporting event; it's a gathering with a bigger purpose. The...

Big Wins at Americas Cardroom's $15M Venom Series

High Stakes and Huge Paydays: The Venom Breakdown Alright, folks, here's a tale of how the cards fell in one of the most electrifying poker standoffs at Americas Cardroom. With prize pools clocking in at a staggering $15.095 million, the Dual Mystery Bounty Venoms really stacked the chips high. From the gritty, bustling halls of the internet to the proverbial green-felt...

Jollibee and DreamWorks Unite for Cultural Celebration

Jollibee Partners with DreamWorks Animation Never thought I’d see the day: Jollibee, that familiar face of fast food, teaming up with the creative juggernaut DreamWorks Animation. They’re calling it a celebration of friendship and Filipino culture, wrapped up neatly in the context of a flick called Forgotten Island. Set to sizzle in theaters on September 25, 2026,...

Leidos' Autonomous Vessels Chart Bold Naval Waters

Leidos' Autonomous Leap with the U.S. Navy Well, today it's all about Leidos, an outfit that's been showing its grit in the world of maritime autonomy. Their systems aren't just tinkering around anymore—they're slicing through the waves at RIMPAC, the Rim of the Pacific, and running alongside the USS Theodore Roosevelt Carrier Strike Group. That's big news in anyone's...

India's First Upright Proton Therapy System Unveiled

A Leap Forward in Cancer Care: Proton Therapy Revolution Dang, just when you think you've heard it all in cancer treatment, Fortis Healthcare drops a bombshell: India’s first upright proton therapy system. Boom! This isn't your run-of-the-mill radiation treatment we're talking about here. This is the futuristic flair of the MEVION S250-FIT™, featuring upright...

Intellectia.AI Transforming Trading with AI Upgrades

Intellectia.AI Sparks New Trading Era Intellectia.AI, from the bustling streets of New York, is cutting through the noise with a flashy update to its AI-powered trading setup. They've thrown a heap of new toys into the ring, letting folks piggyback on high-grade stock moves in the blink of an eye. Gone are the days of fumbling with cumbersome data and execution. Breaking...