My take is that Ben Lurkin has some kind of a vend
Post# of 4379
(Total Views: 742)
Posted On: 03/01/2017 1:45:30 PM
My take is that Ben Lurkin has some kind of a vendetta with the CEO either because he lost money in the past due to being an inept trader or was part of a deal gone wrong. There is no excuse for anyone to have lost money on INCC since 2014 if traded properly due to the windfall opportunity offered to load in the .0002>0020 range after it was shorted down from .0219 in 3Q 2014.
Everything he posts is nonsense and can be disproved with elementary math or just plain common sense.
For instance:
The CEO has not "lost" or "taken" $30M in shareholders' money - $INCC cannot possibly have traded $30M in the entire life of all its incarnations. Traders lose money by choosing to sell for a cheaper price than they bought at because they are impatient or don't trade from the bottom up.
There is no selling of shares by the company - as evidenced by the trading action.
Nobody could have bought a $1M home with profits from $INCC even if they sold every single share traded in the last 6 months for way above the average price during that period.
I made numerous complaints to iHub Admin about Lurkin misusing his Moderator position - including trying to delete my posts several times after I reinstated them myself several times - and incorrect deletions of the posts of others - and nothing was done. Many boards on iHub have been reduced to a joke by a combination of the appointment of basher Mods, corrupt iHub Admin and inadequate TOS that allow deliberately misleading posts to remain up.
Investors Hangout is a much better site for serious traders with only credible Moderators being appointed, far more stringent TOS, a prohibition on the posting of deliberately misleading information or scaremongering, and bashers can be banned instantly. It also now has superior features compared to iHub free such as trade details for those without Level 2 and the news function straight to boards.
Everything he posts is nonsense and can be disproved with elementary math or just plain common sense.
For instance:
The CEO has not "lost" or "taken" $30M in shareholders' money - $INCC cannot possibly have traded $30M in the entire life of all its incarnations. Traders lose money by choosing to sell for a cheaper price than they bought at because they are impatient or don't trade from the bottom up.
There is no selling of shares by the company - as evidenced by the trading action.
Nobody could have bought a $1M home with profits from $INCC even if they sold every single share traded in the last 6 months for way above the average price during that period.
I made numerous complaints to iHub Admin about Lurkin misusing his Moderator position - including trying to delete my posts several times after I reinstated them myself several times - and incorrect deletions of the posts of others - and nothing was done. Many boards on iHub have been reduced to a joke by a combination of the appointment of basher Mods, corrupt iHub Admin and inadequate TOS that allow deliberately misleading posts to remain up.
Investors Hangout is a much better site for serious traders with only credible Moderators being appointed, far more stringent TOS, a prohibition on the posting of deliberately misleading information or scaremongering, and bashers can be banned instantly. It also now has superior features compared to iHub free such as trade details for those without Level 2 and the news function straight to boards.
(1)
(0)International Consolidated Companies, Inc. (INCC) Stock Research Links
"Per Ardua Ad Astra" - "Through Adversity To The Stars"
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.
A very apposite motto for those who trade successfully in the OTC market..
All posts are my opinion - trade at your own risk.