yep ..
i hope all retail realizes just how lucrative the total *lack* of transparency has
been afforded NON RETAIL re: every OTC stock and company
NON RETAILs' cycles of money (and why just a little bit of reading re: mostly
non interchangeable crews working the vehicle of choice for OTC stock
manipulation shows those PRO on PTOI are CON on other OTC targets
and those originally CON on PTOI are PRO on those other OTC stox) usually
produced that 99% stat (outcome) trotted out by rote by assigned CON side
the ability to take a stock up (watching CTIX right now since non retail is damn
close to once again resetting 52 week low) at non retails' CONvenience and
then *hold* X PPS in a rigid range .. b4 the next set up (take DOWN) becomes
crystal clear when one steps back
it's also why the documentation is so reviled .. most retail didn't realize that the
SEC didn't have access to daily trades (tapes) and had to rely on the MMs
for that info ..
as i've noted for a very long time .. NON RETAILs' cracks become very visible the less *volume* or trades show .. and it's why *ramping* volume also matters
(MSRT triggered reg sho again recently) .. but unless one is taking note of the
trades and *sees* the matched wash trades (hidden or not) .. it's just *volume*
and since it's pretty clear to me that NON RETAIL has been *working* PTOI
since 2009 .. it's not that difficult to note *original* interchangeable crew ..
and why
that first hit piece would have to be authored the same month (July 2010)
that NN would need another MM to help off set their *original* dilemma of
not successfully parting PTOI shares from actual P2O investors
something that exists all these years later ..
here's to what P2O files next
4kids
i hope all retail realizes just how lucrative the total *lack* of transparency has
been afforded NON RETAIL re: every OTC stock and company
NON RETAILs' cycles of money (and why just a little bit of reading re: mostly
non interchangeable crews working the vehicle of choice for OTC stock
manipulation shows those PRO on PTOI are CON on other OTC targets
and those originally CON on PTOI are PRO on those other OTC stox) usually
produced that 99% stat (outcome) trotted out by rote by assigned CON side
the ability to take a stock up (watching CTIX right now since non retail is damn
close to once again resetting 52 week low) at non retails' CONvenience and
then *hold* X PPS in a rigid range .. b4 the next set up (take DOWN) becomes
crystal clear when one steps back
it's also why the documentation is so reviled .. most retail didn't realize that the
SEC didn't have access to daily trades (tapes) and had to rely on the MMs
for that info ..
as i've noted for a very long time .. NON RETAILs' cracks become very visible the less *volume* or trades show .. and it's why *ramping* volume also matters
(MSRT triggered reg sho again recently) .. but unless one is taking note of the
trades and *sees* the matched wash trades (hidden or not) .. it's just *volume*
and since it's pretty clear to me that NON RETAIL has been *working* PTOI
since 2009 .. it's not that difficult to note *original* interchangeable crew ..
and why
that first hit piece would have to be authored the same month (July 2010)
that NN would need another MM to help off set their *original* dilemma of
not successfully parting PTOI shares from actual P2O investors
something that exists all these years later ..
here's to what P2O files next
4kids
