Ress Life Investments A/S: Ress Uncorrelated Assets Fund

New Post Public Reply Private Reply Replies (0) Message Board
News Desk 2018
96
Ress Life Investments A/S: Ress Uncorrelated Assets Fund Changes to Management Regulations and Placement Memorandum

Ress Life Investments Holbergsgade 14, 2 tv DK-1057 Copenhagen K Denmark CVR nr. 33593163 www.resslifeinvestments.com To: Nasdaq Copenhagen Date:  21 February 2017

Corporate Announcement 48/2017

Ress Uncorrelated Assets Fund Changes to Management Regulations and Placement Memorandum

Further to corporate announcement 30/2016, Ress Uncorrelated Assets Fund has provided notice to its investors, including Ress Life Investments A/S, that the following changes have been made to its Management Regulations and Placement Memorandum:

  1. Amendments made to the Management Regulations
  1. Change of depositary bank and paying agent (the " Depositary Bank ") and central administration (the " Central Administration ") of the Fund

Further to the absorption of CACEIS Bank Luxembourg by CACEIS Bank France on 31 December 2016 and the subsequent creation of a Luxembourg branch, CACEIS Bank, Luxembourg Branch, the Management Regulations have been updated to reflect that the latter will act as Depositary Bank and Central Administration as of 1 January 2017.

  1. Miscellaneous

It has further been proceeded with other minor updates for consistency purposes with the latest legal changes. In particular, the reference to the law applicable to the Management Company has been amended to reflect the change of law from the law of 20 December 2002 to the law of 17 December 2010, currently applicable.

  1. Amendments made to the Placement Memorandum

                    

  1. Change of Depositary Bank Central Administration

Further to the absorption of CACEIS Bank Luxembourg by CACEIS Bank France on 31 December 2016 and the subsequent creation of a Luxembourg branch, CACEIS Bank, Luxembourg Branch, this latter will act as Depositary Bank and Central Administration as of 1 January 2017.

  1. Common Reporting Standard

Further to the entry into force on 1 January 2016 of the OECD common reporting standard (the " Common Reporting Standard "), the Placement Memorandum has been amended in order to clarify the consequences of the Common Reporting Standard for the Fund and its Unitholders. This includes in particular the duty for the Unitholders to provide certain information to the Fund and the duty to report certain information to the Luxembourg tax authorities.

  1. Change of Investment Policy and Restrictions: purchase of Life Settlements

               The Placement Memorandum has been amended in order to permit investments in term life Life Settlements. As a result, whole life, universal life, term life and variable life Life settlements will be acceptable.

The Placement Memorandum has further been amended in order to reduce the face value threshold from $250,000 to $100,000. As a result, the face value has to be between $100,000 and $ 30 million per insured.

The Placement Memorandum has been amended in order to reflect that in the future, the Sub-Fund will only purchase Life Settlements which life expectancy must be more than 24 months but not longer than 300 months, instead of the current maximum of 240 months.

  1. Decrease of the borrowing policy/leverage policy

In that respect, the Board decided to set the maximum total borrowing of the Sub-Fund achieved by the use of loan instruments at 50% of the Sub-Fund's net assets. As a result, the maximum total leverage of the Sub-Fund is set at 150% of the Sub-Fund's net assets based on either the sum of notionals approach or on the commitment approach.

  1. Changes to the Redemption Procedure and Redemption Limits

In that respect, the Board has amended the Redemption Procedure for investors by providing for monthly instead of quarterly redemptions, changing the cut-off time for redemption requests from 180 calendar days to 30 calendar days before the applicable Redemption Day, and, in conjunction with the former, changed the redemption request limit from 5% to 1.67% of the Units in issue in the Sub-Fund;

Current wording New wording
5.2  Redemption Procedure   Subject to the restrictions set forth below, Units may be redeemed with respect to each Redemption Day, which shall be, for the Sub-Fund, the last Valuation Day of each calendar quarter, i.e. the last Business Day of March, June, September and December. Redemption requests must be received by the Central Administration Agent one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days before the applicable Redemption Day. Requests received after the deadline will not be effective until the next following Redemption Day.   [.]   5.4 Redemption Limits   When redemption requests will be accepted by the Management Company, Unitholders will have the right to redeem a portion of their Units quarterly in March, June, September and December with one hundred and eighty (180) calendar days written notice given in advance of the applicable Redemption Day.   If on any Redemption Day, redemption requests relate to more than 5% of the Units in issue in the Sub-Fund, the Management Company may decide that part or all of such requests for redemption will be deferred proportionally for such period as the Management Company considers to be in the best interests of the Sub-Fund, but normally not exceeding 2 Redemption Days after the Redemption Day in relation to which the relevant redemption request relates. All deferred redemption requests will be met on a pro-rata basis in priority to later requests and in compliance with the principle of equal treatment of Unitholders. 5.2  Redemption Procedure   Subject to the restrictions set forth below, Units may be redeemed with respect to each Redemption Day, which shall be, for the Sub-Fund, the last Valuation Day of each month, i.e. the last Business Day of each month. Redemption requests must be received by the Central Administration Agent thirty (30) calendar days before the applicable Redemption Day. Requests received after the deadline will not be effective until the next following Redemption Day. [.]     5.4 Redemption Limits   When redemption requests will be accepted by the Management Company, Unitholders will have the right to redeem a portion of their Units each month with thirty (30) calendar days written notice given in advance of the applicable Redemption Day.   If on any Redemption Day, redemption requests relate to more than 1.67% of the Units in issue in the Sub-Fund, the Management Company may decide that part or all of such requests for redemption will be deferred proportionally for such period as the Management Company considers to be in the best interests of the Sub-Fund, but normally not exceeding 6 Redemption Days after the Redemption Day in relation to which the relevant redemption request relates. All deferred redemption requests will be met on a pro-rata basis in priority to later requests and in compliance with the principle of equal treatment of Unitholders.
  1. Change of the remuneration of the AIF Manager

The Board has decided to amend the remuneration of the AIF Manager, which will henceforth be based on a hurdle rate, as described below:

Current wording New wording
9.2  Remuneration of the AIF Manager   In consideration for its alternative investment management services applicable to each Class of Units in the Sub-Fund, the AIF Manager shall receive from the Management Company (out of the Management Company's own assets) a remuneration whose nature and amount shall be agreed upon between the AIF Manager and the Management Company in a separate letter.   In addition, in consideration for the investment management services applicable to each Class of Units in the Sub-Fund, the AIF Manager shall receive out of the assets of each Class of the Sub-Fund a performance fee (the " Performance Fee "), equivalent to 15% of the performance above an annualized hurdle rate of 6%, provided the Net Asset Value per Unit at the end of the performance period (as defined hereafter) exceeds the high watermark NAV (as defined hereafter).   The hurdle rate is not cumulative from year to year. Thus, any portion of the hurdle rate that is not earned for any performance period need not be recovered in future performance periods.             The " high watermark NAV " corresponds to the last Net Asset Value per Unit on which a Performance Fee has become payable or been paid, adjusted by the subscriptions and, if applicable, the redemptions since the last Performance Fee payment.                   A " performance period " is a period of twelve months from the 1 st of January to the 31 st December in any year. The first performance period for a Class of the Sub-Fund begins on the last day of the Initial Offering Period (as defined under sub-section 13 below) for such Class of the Sub-Fund and ends on the last Valuation Day of the year.   The Performance Fee is calculated for each Class of Units of the Sub-Fund in respect of each performance period on the basis of the Net Asset Value per Unit after deduction of all expenses, liabilities, and Management Fee (but not the Performance Fee), and is adjusted to take account of all subscriptions and redemptions.   Provision will be made for this Performance Fee on each Valuation Day. In the event of a downturn in performance of the Net Asset Value per Unit during any calculation period, the provisions made in respect of the Performance Fee will be reduced accordingly. If these provisions fall to zero, no Performance Fee will be payable. The Performance Fee will be calculated and accrued as an expense of the relevant Class of Units in respect of each performance period and will be payable to the AIF Manager, subject to realized performance. Realized performance is calculated based on policies that have either been sold by the Fund, surrendered back to the insurance carrier in exchange for surrender value by the Fund or where demise of the insured/insureds has led to the policy paying out maturity proceeds. Payments not linked directly to such policy, for instance fees to the Depositary or Sub-Custodian, are excluded from the realized performance. Realized performance is equal to the proceeds received either as a result of a sale, surrender or maturity, minus the purchase amount, minus all premiums paid for the policy by the Fund, plus any withdrawal proceeds received by the Fund as a result of a withdrawal. For example, the Fund purchases a policy for 200 000 USD, pays 50 000 USD in premiums during the time it owns the policy, makes a withdrawal of 20 000 USD and finally receives the maturity proceeds in the amount of 980 000 USD. In such case, the realized performance generated by this policy is equal to 750 000 USD.                   In the event that a Unitholder redeems its Units in the Sub-Fund prior to the end of a performance period, any accrued but unpaid performance fee relating to those Units shall become payable to the AIF Manager at the last Valuation Day of the relevant performance period. 9.2  Remuneration of the AIF Manager   In consideration for its alternative investment management services applicable to each Class of Units in the Sub-Fund, the AIF Manager shall receive from the Management Company (out of the Management Company's own assets) a remuneration whose nature and amount shall be agreed upon between the AIF Manager and the Management Company in a separate letter.   In addition, in consideration for the investment management services applicable to each Class of Units in the Sub-Fund, the AIF Manager shall receive out of the assets of each Class of the Sub-Fund a performance fee (the " Performance Fee "), equivalent to 15% of the performance above an annualized hurdle rate equivalent to the four week US Treasury bill plus 1 percent, provided the Net Asset Value per Unit at the end of the performance period (as defined hereafter) exceeds the high watermark NAV (as defined hereafter). Further, the performance fee payable to the AIF manager after each performance period will not exceed the maximum annual performance fee (as defined hereafter).   The hurdle rate is not cumulative from year to year. Thus, any portion of the hurdle rate that is not earned for any performance period need not be recovered in future performance periods.   The " high watermark NAV " corresponds to the last Net Asset Value per Unit on which a Performance Fee has become payable or been paid, adjusted by the subscriptions and, if applicable, the redemptions since the last Performance Fee payment.   The " maximum annual performance fee " will be equal to one percent (1%) of the Net Asset Value prior to deducting the performance fee, on the last Valuation Day of the performance period. The maximum annual performance fee is not cumulative from year to year.   A " performance period " is a period of twelve months from the 1 st of January to the 31 st December in any year. The first performance period for a Class of the Sub-Fund begins on the last day of the Initial Offering Period (as defined under sub-section 13 below) for such Class of the Sub-Fund and ends on the last Valuation Day of the year.   The Performance Fee is calculated for each Class of Units of the Sub-Fund in respect of each performance period on the basis of the Net Asset Value per Unit after deduction of all expenses, liabilities, and Management Fee (but not the Performance Fee), and is adjusted to take account of all subscriptions and redemptions. Provision will be made for this Performance Fee on each Valuation Day. In the event of a downturn in performance of the Net Asset Value per Unit during any calculation period, the provisions made in respect of the Performance Fee will be reduced accordingly. If these provisions fall to zero, no Performance Fee will be payable. For establishment of the hurdle rate on each Valuation Day the 4-week US Treasury bill rates on the previous Valuation Day, published by US Federal reserve or other source deemed reputable from time to time, will be used. In cases when no such rates are available for such Valuation Day, the rate from last available preceding day will be used. The Performance Fee will be calculated and accrued as an expense of the relevant Class of Units in respect of each performance period and will be payable to the AIF Manager, subject to realized performance. Realized performance is calculated based on policies that have either been sold by the Fund, surrendered back to the insurance carrier in exchange for surrender value by the Fund or where demise of the insured/insureds has led to the policy paying out maturity proceeds. Payments not linked directly to such policy, for instance fees to the Depositary or Sub-Custodian, are excluded from the realized performance. Realized performance is equal to the proceeds received either as a result of a sale, surrender or maturity, minus the purchase amount, minus all premiums paid for the policy by the Fund, plus any withdrawal proceeds received by the Fund as a result of a withdrawal. For example, the Fund purchases a policy for 200 000 USD, pays 50 000 USD in premiums during the time it owns the policy, makes a withdrawal of 20 000 USD and finally receives the maturity proceeds in the amount of 980 000 USD. In such case, the realized performance generated by this policy is equal to 750 000 USD.   In the event that a Unitholder redeems its Units in the Sub-Fund prior to the end of a performance period, any accrued but unpaid performance fee relating to those Units shall become payable to the AIF Manager on the last Valuation Day of the relevant performance period.  

The first performance period will start on 1 April 2017 and will end on 31 December 2017. Questions related to this announcement can be made to the company's AIF-manager, Resscapital AB.

Contact person: Jonas Mårtenson jonas.martenson@resscapital.com Tel + 46 8 545 282 09

Attachments:

http://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/Attachm...4cce89b4bd

Scroll down for more posts ▼

Top 10 Most Recent News Articles

Machine Grabs Prime Dallas Property Amid Apartment Boom

Updated Category News Views 7

Dallas' Hot Market and Machine's Bold Move Well, well, looks like Machine Investment Group's been busy flexing its real estate muscles, bagging a 490-unit gem in North Dallas—your typical, no-frills off-market grab. We’re talking 75 West, nestled in a juicy infill spot, and it’s catching eyes like gold dust in a pan. You don't need me to tell you North Dallas ain't...

Continue Reading
FutureVault's AI Agents: Transforming Financial Workflows

Updated Category News Views 4

Revolutionizing Financial Operations: FutureVault's AI Approach In the dizzying whirlwind of financial services, the launch of FutureVault AI Agents is a game-changer for document management. This isn't some half-baked tool; it's a full-fledged overhaul of how compliance and operations should tick in the modern age. We've all seen it—a paper trail tangled across systems...

Continue Reading
AI-Driven Lumi Transforms Car Dealership Interactions

Updated Category News Views 8

Lumi: Changing the Car Buying Game Picture this: You're browsing for a new car, head filled with specifics like towing capacity, price points, and trim options. Usually, such queries would send you bouncing around the web, but Lectrium's Lumi promises to keep the questioning—and decision-making—right on the dealership's page. In a move set to shake up the game,...

Continue Reading
The Chemical Industry and EPA: A Broken System?

Updated Category News Views 6

Decades of an Unchecked Revolving Door The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and chemical manufacturers—a dance that’s been going on for what seems like forever. But not in the way you might hope. We're talking about a revolving door where execs and lobbyists waltz into regulatory chairs while regulators slide into cushy industry gigs. Wisner Baum LLP, a stickler...

Continue Reading
K-Beauty Takes Front Stage at Target Beauty Studio

Updated Category News Views 5

Making Waves in the U.S. with K-Beauty SUNGBOON EDITOR and Milk Touch just rolled into Target Beauty Studio, making a splash in the world of K-beauty. From ingredients that boast serious benefits to playful cosmetics that let you express yourself, these brands are shaking up American beauty routines in a big way. Ingredient-Focused Skincare for Every American Face...

Continue Reading
Compass Unveiled: Power Revolution in Private Equity

Updated Category News Views 8

AI-Driven Insights: Revolutionizing Private Equity Strategies Now this is some spicy news from Huntington Beach! Collective just pulled back the curtain on Compass, their AI-fueled platform that's set to shake up how financial advisors tackle private company equity. If you're an advisor who's sick of staring at nebulous balance sheets filled with unquantifiable private...

Continue Reading
Davos Healthcare Aims to Revolutionize Hospital Ratings

Updated Category News Views 7

Throw away those dusty, old reputation surveys—Davos Healthcare just turned the spotlight onto cold, hard data with its new global hospital evaluation platform. Why Davos Healthcare’s Initiative Matters At the C3 US NYC Davos of Healthcare™ Summit, an event that’s rooted itself alongside the United Nations General Assembly, Davos Healthcare unveiled a...

Continue Reading
Sean Trahan Joins Citrin Cooperman: New Tax Lead

Updated Category News Views 8

Citrin Cooperman's Strategic Tax Move If there's one phrase that can spark a debate at a financial water cooler, it's 'transfer pricing.' Today, Citrin Cooperman is throwing its hat further into that ring with the appointment of Sean Trahan as head of their new Transfer Pricing and Value Chain Optimization Practice. This isn't just another reshuffling of office...

Continue Reading
Succession Planning in Turmoil: Only 42% Ready

Updated Category News Views 5

Diving into the Succession Crisis in Finance Succession planning in the financial advisory space is like retirement planning for the rest of us—everyone knows it's crucial, yet too many put it off. Despite the looming retirement wave and desperate interest from the younger cohort, a staggering 42% of financial advisors are still without a documented succession game...

Continue Reading
Cracking the Code of America's Delivery Addiction

Updated Category News Views 4

America's New Obsession: Convenience at a Cost Diving into the relentless hustle, Americans are shelling out big bucks to dodge life's mundane chores. A fresh survey dished out by FinanceBuzz, hitching a ride with Bank of America, gives us a peek into how hooked everyone is on convenience services like food and grocery deliveries. It’s clear people are ready to fork...

Continue Reading

Top 5 Most Recently Viewed Articles

Graham Healthcare Group Celebrates Top Workplaces Recognition

Updated Category News Views 151

Graham Healthcare Group Celebrates Top Workplaces Recognition Graham Healthcare Group has received the esteemed honor of being recognized as a Top Workplace for the fifth consecutive year. This accolade is assigned by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, reflecting the group’s unwavering commitment to creating an exceptional workplace. The Top Workplaces recognition program...

Continue Reading
Methanex Corporation Declares Quarterly Cash Dividend Announcement

Updated Category News Views 188

Overview of Methanex Corporation and Dividend Announcement Methanex Corporation is a leading name in the global methanol industry, renowned for its position as the largest supplier of methanol worldwide. The company's headquarters are situated in Vancouver, where it continues to thrive as a publicly traded entity. Quarterly Cash Dividend Details Recently, Methanex's Board...

Continue Reading
Transforming Investments: The Rise of Ecolab Over 15 Years

Updated Category News Views 174

The Growth Journey of Ecolab Ecolab Inc (NYSE: ECL) has demonstrated significant market resilience and growth over the past decade and a half. An investor making a $100 investment in Ecolab 15 years ago would now see their investment valued at approximately $640.55, based on current market evaluations. This impressive return on investment showcases an annualized growth...

Continue Reading
Understanding Apple's Competitive Edge in Technology Sector

Updated Category News Views 150

Examining Apple's Competitive Landscape in Technology In today’s fast-paced business world, a deep analysis of company performance is essential for both investors and industry enthusiasts. This article delves into a detailed industry comparison, focusing on Apple Inc. (NASDAQ: AAPL) and its key competitors in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals sector. We...

Continue Reading
Thesis Gold Eyes Streamlined Path with IA Substitution

Updated Category News Views 4

Streamlined Process for Thesis Gold & Silver's Ambitions Well, Thesis Gold & Silver is not sitting idly by in the ever-evolving mining industry. Their Lawyers-Ranch project just snagged a confirmation for a substituted Impact Assessment (IA) process, tossing their lot with British Columbia over dealing with federal agencies. When you’re steering a ship through the...

Continue Reading