Just posted this on ihub. Hawk said I shouldn't tr
Post# of 22467
(Total Views: 361)
Posted On: 02/16/2017 2:55:06 AM
Just posted this on ihub. Hawk said I shouldn't try to be rational. Sorry. %)
What is different about QMA is that it a joint venture with favorable terms for QMC. The China partners want the venture to succeed as shown by their doubling the R&D and production centers and strong investment, if you will read the Jan 29 PR. China is one of the fastest growing markets for displays and the JV is in place at the right time to gain market share.
It is hilarious that traders keep saying QMC has not had revenues as their reason while QMC keeps moving forward perfecting their products to the point they gain endorsement, and gaining millions for developing QMA and QMC.
If you think QMC will fail, why waste your time around this board? Find a stock you like and invest in that stock. The regulars here support the management and expect the stock to do well. All the arguments here are the supporters having to defend the company. Why waste your time knocking a stock you are not invested in? Why would you invest in a stock and then knock it? It is not a rational thing people do to be successful. I have heard the argument "I will continue to ask legitimate questions, etc..." The proof that this is not a true reason is that the questions never stop and are never satisfied with the answers. Given that, why are they investors or why are pretending to be investors? Either way, the reader can judge for yourself who to believe.
What is different about QMA is that it a joint venture with favorable terms for QMC. The China partners want the venture to succeed as shown by their doubling the R&D and production centers and strong investment, if you will read the Jan 29 PR. China is one of the fastest growing markets for displays and the JV is in place at the right time to gain market share.
It is hilarious that traders keep saying QMC has not had revenues as their reason while QMC keeps moving forward perfecting their products to the point they gain endorsement, and gaining millions for developing QMA and QMC.
If you think QMC will fail, why waste your time around this board? Find a stock you like and invest in that stock. The regulars here support the management and expect the stock to do well. All the arguments here are the supporters having to defend the company. Why waste your time knocking a stock you are not invested in? Why would you invest in a stock and then knock it? It is not a rational thing people do to be successful. I have heard the argument "I will continue to ask legitimate questions, etc..." The proof that this is not a true reason is that the questions never stop and are never satisfied with the answers. Given that, why are they investors or why are pretending to be investors? Either way, the reader can judge for yourself who to believe.
(2)
(0)