fitz - i will try again Do you believe that CO
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 69)
Posted On: 02/15/2017 5:19:32 PM
Quote:
fitz - i will try again Do you believe that
CO2 causes global warming.
He 'believes' it and so do I. So too do the majority of climatologists.
Quote:
BREAKING!! Poem, you are badly misinformed.
Quote:
Human activity continues to warm the planet over the past 16 years
https://www.skepticalscience.com/no-warming-in-16-years.htm
What the science says...
Select a level... Intermediate Advanced
Sorry, no righty 'I don't believe that sciency shit' level. LOL!
Once natural influences, in particular the impact of El Niño and La Niña, are removed from the recent termperature record, there is no evidence of a significant change in the human contribution to climate change.
Climate Myth...
No warming in 16 years
"...there has been no increase in the global average surface temperature for the past 16 years" (Judith Curry and David Rose)
Update 26/05/2013: The '16 years' video, originally linked from this article, is not representative of the scientific consensus. In fact the short term trends are rather more complicated. The problem is explained in more detail in this article.
Humans have continued to contribute to the greenhouse warming of the planet over the past 16 years. The myth arises from two misconceptions.
Firstly, it ignores the fact that short term temperature trends are strongly influenced by a variety of natural factors and observational limitations which must be analyzed to isolate the human contribution.
Secondly it focuses on one small part of the climate system (the atmosphere) while ignoring the largest part (the oceans). We will address each of these errors in turn.
What factors influence the 16 year trend?
Climate scientists have traditionally looked at climate over long periods - 30 years or more. However the media obsession with short term trends has focused attention on the past 15-16 years. Short term trends are much more complex because they can be affected by many factors which cancel out over longer periods.
In a recent interview James Hansen noted "If you look over a 30-40 year period the expected warming is two-tenths of a degree per decade, but that doesn't mean each decade is going to warm two-tenths of a degree: there is too much natural variability".
The list of factors which can affect short term temperature trends is extensive, and some of them can rival the global warming signal in magnitude over short periods. The following table identifies a range of influences on the recent temperature trend:
Influence Effect Notes
Human GHG emissions Warming
Human sulphate emissions Cooling Recent emissions from China
Coverage bias Cooling HadCRUT4 and NOAA only
Sea surface temperature bias Cooling GISTEMP and NOAA only
The El Niño oscillation Cooling The recent run of La Niñas
Volcanic erruptions Warming Recovery from Pinatubo erruption
Solar cycle Cooling Recent solar minimum
Longer term oscillations Unknown AMO and PDO
Change in ocean heat uptake Cooling Balmaseda et al (2013), Guemas et al (2013)
Most of the short term influences, with the exception of greenhouse gas emissions and probably volcanoes (but see Neely et al 2013), have had a cooling influence.
As a result it is unsurprising that we have seen a reduced rate of warming over the past 16 years. The fact that there has been any warming at all is strongly supportive of the warming effect of greenhouse gas emissions.
The fundamental mechanism of global warming is a change in the top-of-atmosphere energy balance, and as a result the energy content of the climate system provides a more direct measure of global warming which avoids many of these problems, although the observational record is shorter and less complete (e.g. Church et al 2011).
(0)
(0)