In regards to uplisting: (35) "Reverse Merger"
Post# of 2913
(Total Views: 828)
Posted On: 02/07/2017 2:34:28 PM
In regards to uplisting:
5110
(a) Business Combinations with non-Nasdaq Entities Resulting in a Change of Control
So here is what may be going on. According to our friends Yankee and Company, SPCL was never a shell. According to NASDAQ uplisting requirements a company that performs a reverse merger must trade on the OTC for at least one year prior to uplist. A reverse merger is defined by migrating into a shell company. So, since SPCL was never technically a shell, and the acquisition meets rule 5110 A, they may not be required to wait one year. This may be why SPCL was targeted for the acquisition rather than a standard shell.
Thoughts? This is also my one post for the day, y'all can catch me on the other side if you need me.
Just trying to get a real discussion going.
$D$
There was no reason for this to be deleted
Quote:
(35) "Reverse Merger" means any transaction whereby an operating company becomes an Exchange Act reporting company by combining, either directly or indirectly, with a shell company which is an Exchange Act reporting company, whether through a reverse merger, exchange offer, or otherwise. However, a Reverse Merger does not include the acquisition of an operating company by a listed company satisfying the requirements of IM-5101-2 or a business combination described in Rule 5110(a). In determining whether a Company is a shell company, Nasdaq will look to a number of factors, including but not limited to: whether the Company is considered a "shell company" as defined in Rule 12b-2 under the Act; what percentage of the Company's assets are active versus passive; whether the Company generates revenues, and if so, whether the revenues are passively or actively generated; whether the Company's expenses are reasonably related to the revenues being generated; how many employees support the Company's revenue-generating business operations; how long the Company has been without material business operations; and whether the Company has publicly announced a plan to begin operating activities or generate revenues, including through a near-term acquisition or transaction.
5110
(a) Business Combinations with non-Nasdaq Entities Resulting in a Change of Control
Quote:
A Company must apply for initial listing in connection with a transaction whereby the Company combines with a non-Nasdaq entity, resulting in a change of control of the Company and potentially allowing the non-Nasdaq entity to obtain a Nasdaq Listing. In determining whether a change of control has occurred, Nasdaq shall consider all relevant factors including, but not limited to, changes in the management, board of directors, voting power, ownership, and financial structure of the Company. Nasdaq shall also consider the nature of the businesses and the relative size of the Nasdaq Company and non-Nasdaq entity. The Company must submit an application for the post-transaction entity with sufficient time to allow Nasdaq to complete its review before the transaction is completed. If the Company's application for initial listing has not been approved prior to consummation of the transaction, Nasdaq will issue a Staff Delisting Determination and begin delisting proceedings pursuant to the Rule 5800 Series.
So here is what may be going on. According to our friends Yankee and Company, SPCL was never a shell. According to NASDAQ uplisting requirements a company that performs a reverse merger must trade on the OTC for at least one year prior to uplist. A reverse merger is defined by migrating into a shell company. So, since SPCL was never technically a shell, and the acquisition meets rule 5110 A, they may not be required to wait one year. This may be why SPCL was targeted for the acquisition rather than a standard shell.
Thoughts? This is also my one post for the day, y'all can catch me on the other side if you need me.
Just trying to get a real discussion going.
$D$
There was no reason for this to be deleted
(0)
(0)