"and solution was offered, for thosethat fail to c
Post# of 43064
My solution seems simple...but since my solution is different from yours, maybe it's not as intuitive as I think it is.
The solution would be for Mr. Heddle to be transparent and to publish the best runs of the processor during its runs in the second half of 2013:
1) What exactly was fed into the processor? Type, quantity, cost, continuous source or not
2) What exactly came out of the processor with the above feedstock? Type, quantity, realized price, whether there is a ongoing demand.
If Mr. Heddle disclosed those results and the results were positive, investment money would come rolling in and customers would be enthralled. In this case investors would have confidence that Mr. Heddle would be telling the truth as Mr. Heddle appears to have more personal assets to lose in a fraud suit than Mr. Bordynuik did.
Maybe then investors would also start to get some color as to why the customers aren't biting on this supposedly highly valuable technology.
From the skeptics' point of view, it already appears very obvious why Mr. Heddle isn't transparent.