exactly .. one other aspect that seems to elude so
Post# of 43066
(Total Views: 680)
Posted On: 02/03/2017 8:57:11 AM
exactly .. one other aspect that seems to elude some
time factors coupled with a relentless compression since ceo's first $Million$ infused (35c to 10c .. 9.30.13 to 12.31.13)
in the back half of 2013 .. when flagship was fully operational
it's quite clear that both the founder and ceo were almost giddy
based on evals (my connecting dots) .. that was in both voices at 2 events
(Nov's CC audio and Dec's AGM audio) .. that tells me 2 things .. first OBG
(which would be known by July 2014) was in the mix .. and that the undertaking
of ECO re: external sales was also in the mix .. edit .. ECO's LLC was created
in the first Q of 2014 .. so can the ceo be faulted for going the route first of
external sales and then giving the time for ECO to execute .. while conserving
capital at every turn?
sure .. but that is how aspects operate in the real world .. every buyer of P2O
(unless a company with a sustainability account in place for expenditures) will
have investors behind the scenes with their own conditions ..
with ECO's extensions no longer palatable to RH .. he went it alone .. and discovered ..
what some of us have known from the beginning
it can take years to get both your foot in the door .. and line up agreements with
a buyer and the buyer's investors
what i do think is so telling is that P2O (company) has outlasted those who do
abusively target stox by rote .. i.e. there is zero liquidity unless 2 events come
to pass .. P2O provides it .. or those who haven't sold since first invested decide to do so *now*
RH may be many things .. but imo he's not stupid .. which is why i'd suggest all with interest
digest 2016 Updates ..
if March comes and there is no extension granted by RH .. does anyone really
think he won't implement some of what was noted by him in 2016?
i'm specifically referencing this:
http://www.plastic2oil.com/site/news-releases...ve-officer
now it is clear to me that RH is linear in his approach .. so weeks to him turn into months for everyone else .. but it's clear the above is in play .. the ? becomes
when implemented .. my thinking (and it's just my 2c) is that time line coincides
with March's date ..
it's my belief that RH does only focus on one aspect .. and that currently is P2O's first sale ..
but it's equally clear based on 2016 Updates that other factors are in play ..
including imo the price of oil .. possibly having to maintain an avg say above $50
for X amount of time as a condition of this first buyer's investors ..
RH has done everything possible to keep the SS down .. in spite of FILTHs' relentless compression
the CFO is fully invested also
personally i don't see RH allowing another extension in March .. but only RH knows the exact path and the timing of what is en route
i do find it beyond *odd* that while PTOI has a GREEN YOY % .. even with
little to no volume ..and legit bids' picking off and showing significant %s
of what little *volume* is undertaken via those elastic and hidden trades ..
the pot is stirred with zero solutions on offer ..
every actual investor should email the CEO .. i do it frequently .. RH has also
been known to take calls from P2O investors .. anyone who thinks he invested
multiple millions of dollars into P2O for a whim or whatever .. imo is totally deluding themselves
do i think naivete came into play with being the CEO of a public company at times
(vs private) absolutely .. but it was clear to me company's founder also had that
as i've noted since first investing in P2O .. i don't expect seamless out of a newly minted mgmt team
PTOI (stock) has been under attack since P2O (company) was wrested back in mid August 2013
the total lack of acknowledgement re: that factual reality is disingenuous at best
ironic to me that now that P2O itself controls PTOI (timing of material events
and i'm not just referencing the MOU converting to a DA) .. noise increases
here .. and decreases *there*
4kids
time factors coupled with a relentless compression since ceo's first $Million$ infused (35c to 10c .. 9.30.13 to 12.31.13)
in the back half of 2013 .. when flagship was fully operational
it's quite clear that both the founder and ceo were almost giddy
based on evals (my connecting dots) .. that was in both voices at 2 events
(Nov's CC audio and Dec's AGM audio) .. that tells me 2 things .. first OBG
(which would be known by July 2014) was in the mix .. and that the undertaking
of ECO re: external sales was also in the mix .. edit .. ECO's LLC was created
in the first Q of 2014 .. so can the ceo be faulted for going the route first of
external sales and then giving the time for ECO to execute .. while conserving
capital at every turn?
sure .. but that is how aspects operate in the real world .. every buyer of P2O
(unless a company with a sustainability account in place for expenditures) will
have investors behind the scenes with their own conditions ..
with ECO's extensions no longer palatable to RH .. he went it alone .. and discovered ..
what some of us have known from the beginning
it can take years to get both your foot in the door .. and line up agreements with
a buyer and the buyer's investors
what i do think is so telling is that P2O (company) has outlasted those who do
abusively target stox by rote .. i.e. there is zero liquidity unless 2 events come
to pass .. P2O provides it .. or those who haven't sold since first invested decide to do so *now*
RH may be many things .. but imo he's not stupid .. which is why i'd suggest all with interest
digest 2016 Updates ..
if March comes and there is no extension granted by RH .. does anyone really
think he won't implement some of what was noted by him in 2016?
i'm specifically referencing this:
Quote:
Over the next few weeks, we will be sharing important information with you regarding the sales and marketing program that we intend to launch. Our efforts will include direct sales as well as a new partnership. To that end, we made the decision not to further extend our agreement with EcoNavigation as their firm has been unable to conclude processor sales via acceptable terms.
http://www.plastic2oil.com/site/news-releases...ve-officer
now it is clear to me that RH is linear in his approach .. so weeks to him turn into months for everyone else .. but it's clear the above is in play .. the ? becomes
when implemented .. my thinking (and it's just my 2c) is that time line coincides
with March's date ..
it's my belief that RH does only focus on one aspect .. and that currently is P2O's first sale ..
but it's equally clear based on 2016 Updates that other factors are in play ..
including imo the price of oil .. possibly having to maintain an avg say above $50
for X amount of time as a condition of this first buyer's investors ..
RH has done everything possible to keep the SS down .. in spite of FILTHs' relentless compression
the CFO is fully invested also
personally i don't see RH allowing another extension in March .. but only RH knows the exact path and the timing of what is en route
i do find it beyond *odd* that while PTOI has a GREEN YOY % .. even with
little to no volume ..and legit bids' picking off and showing significant %s
of what little *volume* is undertaken via those elastic and hidden trades ..
the pot is stirred with zero solutions on offer ..
every actual investor should email the CEO .. i do it frequently .. RH has also
been known to take calls from P2O investors .. anyone who thinks he invested
multiple millions of dollars into P2O for a whim or whatever .. imo is totally deluding themselves
do i think naivete came into play with being the CEO of a public company at times
(vs private) absolutely .. but it was clear to me company's founder also had that
as i've noted since first investing in P2O .. i don't expect seamless out of a newly minted mgmt team
PTOI (stock) has been under attack since P2O (company) was wrested back in mid August 2013
the total lack of acknowledgement re: that factual reality is disingenuous at best
ironic to me that now that P2O itself controls PTOI (timing of material events
and i'm not just referencing the MOU converting to a DA) .. noise increases
here .. and decreases *there*
4kids
(0)
(0)