again we will agree to disagree .. re: abusive sho
Post# of 43064
i will agree that compared to founder's awareness .. current CEO's is less so
but imo *awareness* does exist ..
there is zero hyperbole with current CEO .. which some may construe as a negative
what i do know is without 4 very separate but equally important entities .. P2O
wouldn't have SURVIVED into 2017 .. thereby highlighting NON RETAILs' lack
of abusive liquidity .. in total .. last month .. which does interest me ..
those 4 are:
founder's disruptive tech .. independently validated and permitted
current ceo's infusion of $Million$ .. hiring of CFO (fully invested) and compliant
former director's documentation .. forcing out those who do destroy by rote and pick for pennies .. what remains if able to be re-packaged which P2O's tech *IS*
P2O investors .. many (not all) of whom have never sold one share .. many (not all) haven't DCA'd to lower respective CB/s .. whose exhaustion/frustration are totally understandable and whose patience isn't infinite
it's why *volume* matters .. and why contrary to what gets posted by some of the
NON interchangeables from the *original* crew working the vehicle of choice
for OTC stock manipulation .. had founder actually sold .. PTOI would have had
back to back volume days on par with other targeted stox .. (30M/60M) and then
gone no bid ..
instead since P2O was wrested back in mid August 2013 .. PTOI's volume is
doing exactly opposite of what NON RETAIL does by rote .. 99 % of the time
volume is decreasing ..
now i'll be clear if RH doesn't execute on any material event he himself noted
in 2016 Updates .. then it's quite possible that that exhaustion and patience
P2O investors have displayed consistently since mid August 2013 .. is gone
that is a risk .. i'm willing to take .. but then i've always recognized risk/reward
when it comes to any stock regardless of where traded
imo P2O (company) has numerous options .. i'm curious to see what *path* is pursued by current mgmt ..
4kids