Nobody is arguing against more in depth background
Post# of 65629
(Total Views: 93)
Posted On: 01/31/2017 2:49:48 PM
Nobody is arguing against more in depth background checks.
Extreme vetting of Syrian refugees, many, many interviews and layers of investigations over 18-24 months, has been in place for 3 years.
And that's for the 1% who make the cut for consideration to come here.
Did you know that?
There are legitimate Constitutional questions at issue here and the screw ups were apparent. Also the fallout from many nations whose cooperation we need in fighting terrorism is not encouraging.
Face it, trump made up his mind that there should e a 'Muslim ban' a long time ago.
Now he's finding out the ramifications for a policy he received appropriate pushback from when he first raised the issue.
Much of it from Republicans.
Extreme vetting of Syrian refugees, many, many interviews and layers of investigations over 18-24 months, has been in place for 3 years.
And that's for the 1% who make the cut for consideration to come here.
Did you know that?
There are legitimate Constitutional questions at issue here and the screw ups were apparent. Also the fallout from many nations whose cooperation we need in fighting terrorism is not encouraging.
Face it, trump made up his mind that there should e a 'Muslim ban' a long time ago.
Now he's finding out the ramifications for a policy he received appropriate pushback from when he first raised the issue.
Much of it from Republicans.
(0)
(0)Scroll down for more posts ▼