I'm not sure what to do yet, and I think every sha

I'm not sure what to do yet, and I think every shareholder has different circumstances. I invested more recently and was sent information from a friend who was looking into investing, fortunately before I invested any more. I still feel very stupid and gullible for not having vetted QMTT as thoroughly as my friend has done (He said shorting would be less risky and more likely for a big return than investing). I posted one link yesterday hoping that someone here might explain the other side of the story to reassure me, but instead I was attacked for having concerns and told that I wasn't welcome as a newcomer. That was a completely unexpected surprise to me that caused red flags to go up and also sucked me into confrontation that I had not intended to get into. Maybe the angry attacks are coming from plants meant to manipulate investors and control the narrative. If not and they are coming from real investors who are blindly loyal to SS, then I'm not sure I want to be involved with this kind of rage-driven company anyway. After yesterday, cutting my losses is becoming more and more appealing, although I'm not so far in that it's too big of a loss. Maybe other likeminded and concerned shareholders who are more significantly invested can unite together to steer Quantum Materials Corp in a better direction away from what has been done in the past and without the people involved in such questionable business practices.

I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt and try again. The only responses I received yesterday were attacking me the messenger, dismissing out of hand that it's old news (as though the CEO of the current company grifting investors 15 years ago as CTO/"Vice Chairman" in a previous company which used the same PR tactics of big promises with little to no results is no longer relevant), and statements that it was already looked into but there wasn't anything to it without any explanation or elaboration as to how those conclusions were drawn (Been there, done that, and satisfied). The claims in the link were from PR sent out by US Global Nanospace (USGN), which merged with US Global Aerospace (USGA), so an explanation as to how the information is not correct or why it isn't of any concern would be helpful to me in making decisions. If you found that there is nothing to it and you believe in Stephen Squires, then please share that information to help me as a shareholder and investor feel as comfortable as you feel about it. Thank you.

Here is the link again for reference:

USGA: In Response to PR by Us