My favorite reply on SA: " grooveshark Comme
Post# of 72446
(Total Views: 180)
Posted On: 01/17/2017 1:11:45 PM
My favorite reply on SA:
"
grooveshark
Comments (15) |+ Follow |Send Message
Wow. Your last article said that their offices were empty. Everyone who has actually gone to the office has found out that isn't true. Then you got the Rosen law firm to actually go to court with your drivel. That got summarily dismissed. Now you're back?
Remember when you said Ocata was worthless? It got purchased for almost $400 million.
Very interesting that short attacks commence as soon as your articles are published. You do realize that the SEC filing you cite regarding CTIX was amended in 2011. It's public record. But if it's all you got, why not stick with it.
It is very cute that you would use the 1st Amendment to shield yourself while attempting to tar CTIX with guilt by association in absence of any actual evidence."
Mako reply: Crickets
"
grooveshark
Comments (15) |+ Follow |Send Message
Wow. Your last article said that their offices were empty. Everyone who has actually gone to the office has found out that isn't true. Then you got the Rosen law firm to actually go to court with your drivel. That got summarily dismissed. Now you're back?
Remember when you said Ocata was worthless? It got purchased for almost $400 million.
Very interesting that short attacks commence as soon as your articles are published. You do realize that the SEC filing you cite regarding CTIX was amended in 2011. It's public record. But if it's all you got, why not stick with it.
It is very cute that you would use the 1st Amendment to shield yourself while attempting to tar CTIX with guilt by association in absence of any actual evidence."
Mako reply: Crickets
(6)
(0)