Ban a poster for asking pertinent questions that n
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 394)
Posted On: 01/05/2017 11:37:08 AM
Ban a poster for asking pertinent questions that no one seems to be able to answer...?
Trans-Pacific Aerospace C TPAC
Posted On: 01/05/2017 11:22:22 AM
Post#
17087
of 17091 GO
Replies (1)
Posted By: Ragz2Richez
Re: Combine_Kid #17084
hey Jeff or any other mod.....why is combine allowed here? honestly.....either ban him or remove his posts
Then you accuse (subtly) TradingJeff of the same?
There is no logical path to 350 let alone the big jump to 550MM as of today. Volume isnt there. And if there is a logical path that isnt apparent/obvious to investors - why not provide the specifics/details and end the debate? How does the MRVB/company get around SEC buyback rules 30 day moving avg vol limits? Whether announced or unannounced- my understanding is the limits apply. Please direct me elsewhere on SEC site if that is not the case.
Since IR doesnt answer emails that arent directly related to MRVB stock picks or c shares - that is a non starter. They have ignored the buyback start question,the 350MM question, and who "owns" the MRVB previously. So - telling me to email IR is pointless. Why doesnt one of the pro IR posters email IR and then just post their reply since they claim on here IR always answers?
Trans-Pacific Aerospace C TPAC
Posted On: 01/05/2017 11:22:22 AM
Post#
17087
of 17091 GO
Replies (1)
Posted By: Ragz2Richez
Re: Combine_Kid #17084
hey Jeff or any other mod.....why is combine allowed here? honestly.....either ban him or remove his posts
Then you accuse (subtly) TradingJeff of the same?
There is no logical path to 350 let alone the big jump to 550MM as of today. Volume isnt there. And if there is a logical path that isnt apparent/obvious to investors - why not provide the specifics/details and end the debate? How does the MRVB/company get around SEC buyback rules 30 day moving avg vol limits? Whether announced or unannounced- my understanding is the limits apply. Please direct me elsewhere on SEC site if that is not the case.
Since IR doesnt answer emails that arent directly related to MRVB stock picks or c shares - that is a non starter. They have ignored the buyback start question,the 350MM question, and who "owns" the MRVB previously. So - telling me to email IR is pointless. Why doesnt one of the pro IR posters email IR and then just post their reply since they claim on here IR always answers?
(5)
(1)