hey Dan....please speak for yourself only. thanks
Post# of 22940
(Total Views: 732)
Posted On: 01/03/2017 1:08:34 PM
hey Dan....please speak for yourself only. thanks
Shareholder Dan Has a Plan to Get Shareholders a Reverse-Split
Greetings all..
JAMES you failed to make your 2016 $.01 end of year ‘TPAC’ target, projection, prediction, conference call big talk etc… Yes you talk the big talk but you have yet to walk the big walk. Many shareholders lose faith when they experience/hear the same falsehood over and over . ‘TPAC’ 2017 target you said will be $.05 pps. I will pray you and Bill McKay do not fail. FAILURE IS UNACCEPTABLE. I have written this rebuke with the hope that your efforts to help make ‘TPAC’ a success will improve substantially in 2017.
Sincerely,
TPAC shareholder
Dan J. Falcone
djfalcone@hotmail.com
S7 here this morning the above email arrived, I want you all to take a long, long, look at it. Because Dan speaks for the TPAC Shareholder. He speaks about failure and about "walking the walk and talking the talk".
However, he didn't speak about reading continuous Q/K that told each of you CEO Bill was broke, the company was in debt and had not had a major contract in almost 8 years. He didn't speak to his ability as a wise trader to take all that into consideration before he acquired TPAC. Nor did he demonstrate that he was a wise investor and use basic best practices for holding and releasing his stock. He blames all the failure on TPAC. Shareholder Dan really thinks that he is wise enough to counsel TPAC.
Well first thing he wrote was wrong, IR manager James doesn't write policy nor PR's. See if he can't get that right then it is easy to see that he isn't a wise investor. What he is, well, it is a new year let's not call names like idiot or dumb-dumb, or something like stupid. Even silly rabbit...
What I say to Dan is simple, TPAC has a better system that keeps on getting better. However, if you dumb shareholders like to have a .01 or higher, TPAC can reverse split you there. NO problem, so if that is what you want LET S7 KNOW. I am sure Dan will be happy. Hell, that would save TPAC a whole lot of revenue. So who is with Dan? Let's look at TP gain today. $8k up, I am sure Bill would like to be able to keep it all instead of supporting a dumb PPS, right.................?
Shareholder Dan Has a Plan to Get Shareholders a Reverse-Split
Greetings all..
JAMES you failed to make your 2016 $.01 end of year ‘TPAC’ target, projection, prediction, conference call big talk etc… Yes you talk the big talk but you have yet to walk the big walk. Many shareholders lose faith when they experience/hear the same falsehood over and over . ‘TPAC’ 2017 target you said will be $.05 pps. I will pray you and Bill McKay do not fail. FAILURE IS UNACCEPTABLE. I have written this rebuke with the hope that your efforts to help make ‘TPAC’ a success will improve substantially in 2017.
Sincerely,
TPAC shareholder
Dan J. Falcone
djfalcone@hotmail.com
S7 here this morning the above email arrived, I want you all to take a long, long, look at it. Because Dan speaks for the TPAC Shareholder. He speaks about failure and about "walking the walk and talking the talk".
However, he didn't speak about reading continuous Q/K that told each of you CEO Bill was broke, the company was in debt and had not had a major contract in almost 8 years. He didn't speak to his ability as a wise trader to take all that into consideration before he acquired TPAC. Nor did he demonstrate that he was a wise investor and use basic best practices for holding and releasing his stock. He blames all the failure on TPAC. Shareholder Dan really thinks that he is wise enough to counsel TPAC.
Well first thing he wrote was wrong, IR manager James doesn't write policy nor PR's. See if he can't get that right then it is easy to see that he isn't a wise investor. What he is, well, it is a new year let's not call names like idiot or dumb-dumb, or something like stupid. Even silly rabbit...
What I say to Dan is simple, TPAC has a better system that keeps on getting better. However, if you dumb shareholders like to have a .01 or higher, TPAC can reverse split you there. NO problem, so if that is what you want LET S7 KNOW. I am sure Dan will be happy. Hell, that would save TPAC a whole lot of revenue. So who is with Dan? Let's look at TP gain today. $8k up, I am sure Bill would like to be able to keep it all instead of supporting a dumb PPS, right.................?
(4)
(0)