You're right ! There have been many statements
Post# of 82687
Posted On: 12/16/2016 11:16:45 AM
You're right !
There have been many statements or official entries from SFOR directly or in court docs where they state that they're currently in discussions for a resolution...
It's like this "say uncle! No! You say uncle"
Or "hey? You wanna settle?" "No!"
There, they've had discussions.
The problem is that people take what is written and then they let their own bias skew, slant, or flat out decide something far beyond what was actually written.
"It sure is a rainy day here"
That's what's written.
Depending on your bias, you say "some guy in San Diego is complaining that it is raining but but they're in a drought and he should be happy"
Depending on someone else's bias "some guy in San Diego says 'what global warming?' ....global warming is real and he's a Trump fan."
All I said was "it sure is a rainy day here"
See what I mean?
I've seen it 1000's of times in SFOR boards. There is actually one person who actually thinks SFOR's MSFT yielded a $9.7 million dollar settlement (its true, that did happen) AND they believe that SFOR was also awarded an annual $4 million dollar payment from the same suit.
Now How is that even possible UNLESS something was said or written by Kay AND THEN over a period of loose or incorrect interpretations, it made its way down the coconut telegraph? It's so far down the monkey telephone now that it has turned into something this person actually believes and defends tooth and nail.
All the while... SFOR falls daily... what's its low so far today? $0.0033?
Why?
Manipulative traders?
Shorts?
Day traders?
No... it's falling and headed to the $0.0020's because SFOR doesn't have 1/5th of the MSFT settlement yet, they're not going to release a 10k guidance, there's no end in sight to current settlements and SFOR has so badly destroyed the share structure with billions of preferred shares and billions in A/S that without press or an AWESOME 8k there is no way longs could keep the stock up.
There have been many statements or official entries from SFOR directly or in court docs where they state that they're currently in discussions for a resolution...
It's like this "say uncle! No! You say uncle"
Or "hey? You wanna settle?" "No!"
There, they've had discussions.
The problem is that people take what is written and then they let their own bias skew, slant, or flat out decide something far beyond what was actually written.
"It sure is a rainy day here"
That's what's written.
Depending on your bias, you say "some guy in San Diego is complaining that it is raining but but they're in a drought and he should be happy"
Depending on someone else's bias "some guy in San Diego says 'what global warming?' ....global warming is real and he's a Trump fan."
All I said was "it sure is a rainy day here"
See what I mean?
I've seen it 1000's of times in SFOR boards. There is actually one person who actually thinks SFOR's MSFT yielded a $9.7 million dollar settlement (its true, that did happen) AND they believe that SFOR was also awarded an annual $4 million dollar payment from the same suit.
Now How is that even possible UNLESS something was said or written by Kay AND THEN over a period of loose or incorrect interpretations, it made its way down the coconut telegraph? It's so far down the monkey telephone now that it has turned into something this person actually believes and defends tooth and nail.
All the while... SFOR falls daily... what's its low so far today? $0.0033?
Why?
Manipulative traders?
Shorts?
Day traders?
No... it's falling and headed to the $0.0020's because SFOR doesn't have 1/5th of the MSFT settlement yet, they're not going to release a 10k guidance, there's no end in sight to current settlements and SFOR has so badly destroyed the share structure with billions of preferred shares and billions in A/S that without press or an AWESOME 8k there is no way longs could keep the stock up.
(1)
(0)