Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Quantum Materials Corp. (QTMM) Message Board

Likely independent contractor, e.g., 1099 position

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (1)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 22467
Posted On: 12/09/2016 6:00:17 AM
Posted By: qtmmshareholder
Re: chessmite #4032
Likely independent contractor, e.g., 1099 positions, covered under his time as a self-employed consultant:

Chief Executive Officer
Marketer International
July 2014 – Present (2 years 6 months)San Francisco Bay Area


He had lots of part-time assignments prior to joining QMC as an outside board member. Of course, that too was a part-time position. Currently, as a "direct" employee and the CEO..., one would assume he's a full-timer. It's possible the other start-ups are just slow to update their web sites. Especially if they lost their marketing guy.

While Sri does have the non-guaranteed variable component of his compensation tied up in QTMM stock, it says something that the board members (Sri, Dan, & Ray) in general, have not purchased many shares or risked their own capital. Sure Craig has shares but he kind of bought his way into the company during one of the fundraising events. http://www.financial-spread-betting.com/strat...lings.html

In terms of QMC's quick adjustment to the pre 14a, who says they were responding to shareholders??? Do the math. It was a dramatic mistake. They likely found it on their own.

335M/400M shares = 84%
with a 25:1 split and a raise to 600M shares it drops to
13/600M shares =2%
followed by
13/100M shares =13%

Clearly, something this extreme had to be unintentional and probably cleaned up by them independent of shareholder concerns. That's why it seemed like a quick response. I'd bet the reduction to 100M shares was an accidental omission that got immediately fixed.


(0)
(0)




Quantum Materials Corp. (QTMM) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us