I awoke this morning thinking that stock(s) are like letters of credit that have yet to be redeemed.
Then I thoguht that lenders whether banks, credit card companies, or some such always had terms......even with business
contractors, there were terms and expectations, as well as limits and fines for missed deadlines.
My thoughts then drifted to Home Owners and contracting for repairs. I wondered how many Home Owners had their own contract,
as the Business Contractor always tend to have theirs.
Home Owners have the right to bring their own contract to the table, but often times don't.
If expectations aren't met and there is only one contract, whom was deficient?
Getting back to stock being like letters of credit; Buying into a stock where credit has been approved, already has terms set.
When new credit is brought to the table and there is only one contract, whom was deficient?
If stockholders don't have anything on the table, maybe it's because they didn't ask.
I've heard some say if you don't trust......
To me that statement is implying something slanderous or casting aspersions where it's not warranted.
Let me be clear. I have thought and continue to think well of the team of people assembled at QMC....well, enough that no share
has been sold. I don't know that many can say that.
This is business and QMC is acting in a business like fashion. They have brought their contract to the table.
Jamis, called for and received AS reduction @ same ratio as RS, (if applied)....at which point he committed his vote for QMC's proposal.
I have asked for more information and consideration for a portion of future spin offs. Personally, I don't think that's much and would add to the incentive and comfort level of investors going forward.
If investors receive no more; then maybe it's because they didn't bring anything to the table and ask.
Rather than anger or something like; if you don't trust....how about really thinking about what you want to bring to the table?
Big Thanks for All that bring their A Game
Then I thoguht that lenders whether banks, credit card companies, or some such always had terms......even with business
contractors, there were terms and expectations, as well as limits and fines for missed deadlines.
My thoughts then drifted to Home Owners and contracting for repairs. I wondered how many Home Owners had their own contract,
as the Business Contractor always tend to have theirs.
Home Owners have the right to bring their own contract to the table, but often times don't.
If expectations aren't met and there is only one contract, whom was deficient?
Getting back to stock being like letters of credit; Buying into a stock where credit has been approved, already has terms set.
When new credit is brought to the table and there is only one contract, whom was deficient?
If stockholders don't have anything on the table, maybe it's because they didn't ask.
I've heard some say if you don't trust......
To me that statement is implying something slanderous or casting aspersions where it's not warranted.
Let me be clear. I have thought and continue to think well of the team of people assembled at QMC....well, enough that no share
has been sold. I don't know that many can say that.
This is business and QMC is acting in a business like fashion. They have brought their contract to the table.
Jamis, called for and received AS reduction @ same ratio as RS, (if applied)....at which point he committed his vote for QMC's proposal.
I have asked for more information and consideration for a portion of future spin offs. Personally, I don't think that's much and would add to the incentive and comfort level of investors going forward.
If investors receive no more; then maybe it's because they didn't bring anything to the table and ask.
Rather than anger or something like; if you don't trust....how about really thinking about what you want to bring to the table?
Big Thanks for All that bring their A Game
1
