Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. Stock Boards ›
  4. Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Message Board

Trump what i actually posted was: "When TPAC m

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 22940
Posted On: 12/06/2016 8:57:07 PM
Posted By: coolmofo
Re: Trumpcard #16033
Trump what i actually posted was:

"When TPAC makes me $100k+instead of TPAC making $100k+ I will be impressed, whether that be from a MRVB or selling bearings, makes no difference to me as a shareholder but I will feel more comfortable when it comes from the core business. "

I didn't say I wanted to make a $100k. With the amount of shares I have, that goal would be pretty easy to achieve when the stock gets moving again. I simply said I wasn't impressed by the MRVB.

Trump.. What I was doing was making a comparitive statement and responding to a question. Using the current MRVB values being tossed around, $100k in revenue to TPAC with 4.5 billion shares is frankly the equivalent to a chocolate gold coin. In THAT grand scheme it really means nothing. NOW as mag pointed out, and I do agree with him is that, the road they are using to compound that $100k seems to be working remarkably well, and we should be looking at the road and where it may lead and not necessarily the distance we traveled yet.
In the converse that same dollar amount of $100k to a shareholder on their investment is much more impressive and carries a lot more promise, obviously becuase $100k return with 4.5 billion shares out there represents serious income to the company where an MRVB wouldnt even have even been a strategy.That said you are indeed correct, income is income and who cares where it comes from. I as a shareholder, at least at this point am not impressed. That's all.

The compartive statement I am using is to illustrate that I would be more impressed with a
strong balance sheet and a tangebile product giving me a return rather than a MRVB investment strategy.



(2)
(0)




Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links


  1.  
  2.  


  3.  
  4.  
  5.  






Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us