Personally, I wish they would let MRVB(s) build fo

Personally, I wish they would let MRVB(s) build for some time. If you understand the concept of the current mechanics of Core, then, there should not be a rush to "flush" revenue from MRVB for Share Reduction or "false growth". I believe it is two-fold at this point; To show proof of concept, as well as shareholder pressure, to release any funds that continue to generate in scaleability. I tend to more strongly believe that it is more for the public proof of concept. It appears that one of possibly 2 new MRVB's ready to be opened currently has an interest in the amount of $980k, as mentioned by our eyes and ears Muse today, yes significant scale potential. Initially, FR had set 10% of revenue to be set aside for MRVB. I believe that with proof of concept accepted by CEO, Bill McKay, that it was in fact increased to 20% of any generated revenue to date. I further believe that MRVB Global was just reconfigured to 4X and was termed by IR as "The Power-House", so I would presume that is where the 20% revenue would be placed, (I believe the funding from MRVB Global that is transferred to Prime, ( for share accumulation is further increased with a 2X as a multiply before it is utilized). Very exciting times for TPAC....Without Utilizing Shares to Do It..(Emphasis..!!!). Bill and Team have finally created a unique prize.....Bearings....??....Haven't vanished by a long shot, still NAVAIR Certified, and about to finalize AU TPAC in second quarter '17, currently on schedule. MRVB purely offers something that may be of interest to listed and continuing Share Holders of TPAC as an in-house addition to increasing your personal revenue as well as seeing your shares increase.....Just My Thought's....