Mag, Appreciate the comment and well stated. W
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 12/06/2016 7:33:49 PM
Mag,
Appreciate the comment and well stated.
What you quoted from me though is contradictory to the basis of your response.
My quote agrees with your thoughts.
It is a compounding income source that seems to be working to generate income. (For the record I use the word "MUSE " metaphorically to
MRVB). I got yelled at already!!
I was simply answering a question. I am just not impressed with the MRVB. Even if the MRVB generated a million dollars next year, what does that really do to the share price @4.5billion shares, lets do the math together. I understand your point 100% though and I don't claim to have it all down, but this is just a side income stream and is not meant to detract from the core business strategy. I GET IT. I AM WITH YOU. Im just not impressed by it that's all. I am not a day trader nor do I want to flip my shares when the share price goes up a point -so I am long. In that sense there is no way the MRVB income will take this to even a nickel stock or greater so here again means nothing to me other than than the fact its helping not die on the vine before it can become the conglemerate monster it has the potential to become.
I am just being pragmatic. When TPAC makes me $100k+instead of TPAC making $100k+ I will be impressed, whether that be from a MRVB or selling bearings, makes no difference to me as a shareholder but I will feel more comfortable
when it comes from the core business.
That's all.
Until then this is all just really speculation and semantics.
Appreciate the comment and well stated.
What you quoted from me though is contradictory to the basis of your response.
My quote agrees with your thoughts.
It is a compounding income source that seems to be working to generate income. (For the record I use the word "MUSE " metaphorically to
MRVB). I got yelled at already!!
I was simply answering a question. I am just not impressed with the MRVB. Even if the MRVB generated a million dollars next year, what does that really do to the share price @4.5billion shares, lets do the math together. I understand your point 100% though and I don't claim to have it all down, but this is just a side income stream and is not meant to detract from the core business strategy. I GET IT. I AM WITH YOU. Im just not impressed by it that's all. I am not a day trader nor do I want to flip my shares when the share price goes up a point -so I am long. In that sense there is no way the MRVB income will take this to even a nickel stock or greater so here again means nothing to me other than than the fact its helping not die on the vine before it can become the conglemerate monster it has the potential to become.
I am just being pragmatic. When TPAC makes me $100k+instead of TPAC making $100k+ I will be impressed, whether that be from a MRVB or selling bearings, makes no difference to me as a shareholder but I will feel more comfortable
when it comes from the core business.
That's all.
Until then this is all just really speculation and semantics.
(6)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼