First of all, that is not a question that anyone here should have to answer. Who cares why? I don't know what the TOU is here, but I know that when you sign up with ihub you must read through a TOU that includes statements to the effect that: the poster may not be who he says he is, may not have the expertise that he says he does, and that it is an opinions-only board that cannot be relied upon for investment advice. In other words, anyone using the sight may be completely misled.
So, if someone chooses to post negatively, that is within the rules and their choice. All part of giving all opinions out there a fair shake. I think that now that the ihub board is being moderated by the people running the site, the TOU is being followed pretty closely. Now I don't post there, just an observation. There is nothing wrong with posting negatively, it is within the TOU.
I can correct you on one point. TBG did post favourably for Bordynuik once or twice. Janice Shell was calling him a "stock promoter" and he told her that he was the CEO of a company and that was not fair. So the record for both of us is not 100% negative.
I can only tell you why I post and what I do. I generally follow the board and look for a post or comment that I think is misleading to potential investors. If I have expertise to bring to the table, I will post it. Perfectly normal. It is not some devious plot to bring down the company and is not done in discussion or concert with anyone else.
Positive or negative does not matter to me. Of course there are positive things about JBI. Turning plastic into oil is a wonderful thing. That is not the point. If you look at hundreds of stocks, you begin to turn them away if they have any issues whatsoever. Lots of positive things in those stocks. just being discerning... and it happens to be in an area where I have experience to offer. JBI captured my interest and I follow it. Any stock has to be totally compelling for me to buy it.
That is about all it is, nothing more.
