"the answer to each of your questions, pp, is -- o
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 12/05/2016 3:08:24 PM
"the answer to each of your questions, pp, is -- of course -- that it has been a scam from the very inception of the idea of JBII/PTOI."
Absolutely. It's hard to come up with any cogent argument for saying that PTOI isn't a scam.
Mr. Heddle now literally is bypassing Niagara with his 'licensing' story. Shareholders who are paying attention can see that the previous story was that there's a fully functioning latest-and-greatest processor which only needs to have piping and a condenser fixed and then there would be no zoning/permitting/building/logistical/contract signing/negotiation snags. The 'flagship' just needs to be turned on to make money if everything is as PTOI represented to shareholders.
Given Niagara's central location, most of the East Coast and well into the Midwest is within 400 miles. The most it would cost for a 40 ton truck to haul plastic from that large radius at $2.00/mile is $800...or about $20/ton for shipping. That translates to shipping costs of about $0.01/lb of plastic...or about $0.08 per gallon of 'fuel'. Does that fairly trivial $0.08/gallon cost make the economics suddenly not work??...then maybe Mr. Heddle should make that clear to investors.
The circumstantial evidence that shareholders are being deceived by PTOI is overwhelming. Even if a person doesn't do the math, they can see seven and a half years of company excuses for why this supposedly technology of utmost value just can't be used. Additional years without finding a single interested customer for this 'disruptive technology' should also throw up another red flag.
But optimistic shareholders plod on, willing to accept any and all excuses Mr. Heddle dishes out.
Absolutely. It's hard to come up with any cogent argument for saying that PTOI isn't a scam.
Mr. Heddle now literally is bypassing Niagara with his 'licensing' story. Shareholders who are paying attention can see that the previous story was that there's a fully functioning latest-and-greatest processor which only needs to have piping and a condenser fixed and then there would be no zoning/permitting/building/logistical/contract signing/negotiation snags. The 'flagship' just needs to be turned on to make money if everything is as PTOI represented to shareholders.
Given Niagara's central location, most of the East Coast and well into the Midwest is within 400 miles. The most it would cost for a 40 ton truck to haul plastic from that large radius at $2.00/mile is $800...or about $20/ton for shipping. That translates to shipping costs of about $0.01/lb of plastic...or about $0.08 per gallon of 'fuel'. Does that fairly trivial $0.08/gallon cost make the economics suddenly not work??...then maybe Mr. Heddle should make that clear to investors.
The circumstantial evidence that shareholders are being deceived by PTOI is overwhelming. Even if a person doesn't do the math, they can see seven and a half years of company excuses for why this supposedly technology of utmost value just can't be used. Additional years without finding a single interested customer for this 'disruptive technology' should also throw up another red flag.
But optimistic shareholders plod on, willing to accept any and all excuses Mr. Heddle dishes out.
(0)
(0)Plastic2Oil, Inc. (PTOI) Stock Research Links
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product and/or technology even more revolutionary.