It doesn't look good to me to see the 99 for $99 s
Post# of 96897
Posted On: 11/29/2016 12:04:07 AM
It doesn't look good to me to see the 99 for $99 special back up again this year. It appears we are still cash strapped but yet we have nothing new to show for it at least in terms of new content. The 99 for $99 is a clear indicator to me that we simply don't have the subscribers necessary to sustain any real growth and lets face it NTEK isn't going to make any real money selling 4K movies at a buck a pop even with a 75% percent savings in content delivery.
So on the surface, I don't like this move but if it's in lieu of additional dilution I'll take it for sure. On the other hand, if it precedes a new content deal to include hdr, well then, I can hardly think of a better or more cost effective way to raise an eyebrow or two to the millions of new 4K tv and mobile device owners.
Please drop a detailed update to the shareholders. Whatever the news, it certainly isn't ALL restricted due to an non disclosure agreement. How about starting off with an easy one, like how many full time / part time employees do we currently have? Maybe some specifics on the new servers, etc. That doesn't seem like asking for too much, does it? We the shareholders can start to extrapolate from there. I can tell ya, it'd likely make a difference to some of us who are debating on whether or not to add additional funding to the mix. Just sayin'.
Atlas1
So on the surface, I don't like this move but if it's in lieu of additional dilution I'll take it for sure. On the other hand, if it precedes a new content deal to include hdr, well then, I can hardly think of a better or more cost effective way to raise an eyebrow or two to the millions of new 4K tv and mobile device owners.
Please drop a detailed update to the shareholders. Whatever the news, it certainly isn't ALL restricted due to an non disclosure agreement. How about starting off with an easy one, like how many full time / part time employees do we currently have? Maybe some specifics on the new servers, etc. That doesn't seem like asking for too much, does it? We the shareholders can start to extrapolate from there. I can tell ya, it'd likely make a difference to some of us who are debating on whether or not to add additional funding to the mix. Just sayin'.
Atlas1
(14)
(0)