Here is an opinion from someone who has followed t

Here is an opinion from someone who has followed the ongoing theatrics of $TPAC. First, revenue is revenue is revenue. So long as it is legitimately acquired, who cares how? I certainly don't. It was stated previously that BTL revs won't start until the moving of the office was completed. No such report has been made. In the meantime, MRVB is the current source of income for the company. As for EIA, we will know nothing until shipment arrives at the dock, which, by the way, happens to be the same time payment is received. This will act as instant revenue growth at this point. I'm pretty sure this is what investors look for when investing in a company. To this point we have had no growth other then the MRVB capital expansion. Things are progressing nicely. For me, no time stamp is necessary. From what I've read, that doesn't hold true for others. The pps target has changed from .01 by eoy to .05 by asap. Hardly a step in the wrong direction. As for the professionalism of muse, it's twitter! Take some time to read other tweets and tell me how many you see with proper grammar. Then take a look at what's been tweeted at muse. What some of you call unprofessional, others see as fighting fire with fire. It's a winless argument from either side. So let's just stop talking about it. Recap MRVB... currently expanding currency. EIA... payment upon delivery. Bearings/rod ends... operations commence upon completion of move into BTL.Muse...irrelevant to company income. Instead of arguing over who's ball it is let's start using this open forum to discuss facts and the future of our investment. This board has drawn many of us here because of great dd and viable facts! At this point, I wouldn't be surprised if the effects aren't sending out the opposite vibe.