H.R.2802 First Amendment Defense Act 114th Congress

New Post Public Reply Private Reply Replies (0) Message Board
PoemStone OMO #25968
H.R.2802
First Amendment Defense Act
114th Congress (2015-2016) | Get alerts

law-and-dailylife-header.jpg

First Amendment - U.S. Constitution
First Amendment - Religion and Expression

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances . - See more

Committees: House - Oversight and Government Reform; Ways and Means
Latest Action: 06/17/2015 Referred to House Ways and Means ( All Actions )

There is one version of the bill.

To prevent discriminatory treatment of any person on the basis of views held with respect to marriage.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 17, 2015

Mr. Labrador (for himself, Mr. Collins of Georgia, Mr. Jones, Mr. Sessions, Mr. Duncan of South Carolina, Mrs. Hartzler, Mr. Cramer, Mr. Neugebauer, Mr. Pearce, Mr. Lamborn, Mr. Sam Johnson of Texas, Mr. Sanford, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Rothfus, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Mullin, Mr. Pompeo, Mr. Smith of Texas, Mr. Pittenger, Mr. Walberg, Mr. Jody B. Hice of Georgia, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Lipinski, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Palmer, Mr. Meadows, Mr. Allen, Mr. Huelskamp, Mr. Pitts, Mr. Graves of Georgia, Mr. Miller of Florida, Mr. Garrett, Mr. Fincher, Mr. Salmon, Mr. Westmoreland, Mr. Smith of New Jersey, Mr. Grothman, Mr. Harris, Mrs. Wagner, Mr. Weber of Texas, Mr. Fleming, Mr. Kelly of Pennsylvania, Mr. Babin, Mr. Yoho, Mr. Chaffetz, Mr. Fortenberry, Mr. Palazzo, Mr. Carter of Texas, Mr. Rouzer, Mrs. Black, Mr. Brat, Mr. Mooney of West Virginia, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Bishop of Utah, Mrs. Love, Mr. Gowdy, Mr. Aderholt, and Mr. Stewart) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned
A BILL

To prevent discriminatory treatment of any person on the basis of views held with respect to marriage.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. Short title.

This Act may be cited as the “First Amendment Defense Act”.

SEC. 2. Findings.

Congress finds the following:

(1) Leading legal scholars concur that conflicts between same-sex marriage and religious liberty are real and should be legislatively addressed.

(2) As the President stated in response to the decision of the Supreme Court on the Defense of Marriage Act in 2013, “Americans hold a wide range of views” on the issue of same-sex marriage, and “maintaining our Nation’s commitment to religious freedom” is “vital”.

(3) Nevertheless, in 2015, when asked whether a religious school could lose its tax-exempt status for opposing same-sex marriage, the Solicitor General of the United States represented to the United States Supreme Court that “ t’s certainly going to be an issue”.

(4) Protecting religious freedom from Government intrusion is a Government interest of the highest order. Legislatively enacted measures advance this interest by remedying, deterring, and preventing Government interference with religious exercise in a way that complements the protections mandated by the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.

(5) Laws that protect the free exercise of religious beliefs and moral convictions about marriage will encourage private citizens and institutions to demonstrate tolerance for those beliefs and convictions and therefore contribute to a more respectful, diverse, and peaceful society.

SEC. 3. Protection of the free exercise of religious beliefs and moral convictions.

(a) In general.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Federal Government shall not take any discriminatory action against a person, wholly or partially on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or that sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.

(b) Discriminatory action defined.—As used in subsection (a), a discriminatory action means any action taken by the Federal Government to—

(1) alter in any way the Federal tax treatment of, or cause any tax, penalty, or payment to be assessed against, or deny, delay, or revoke an exemption from taxation under section 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 of, any person referred to in subsection (a);

(2) disallow a deduction for Federal tax purposes of any charitable contribution made to or by such person;

(3) withhold, reduce, exclude, terminate, or otherwise deny any Federal grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, loan, license, certification, accreditation, employment, or other similar position or status from or to such person;

(4) withhold, reduce, exclude, terminate, or otherwise deny any benefit under a Federal benefit program from or to such person; or

(5) otherwise discriminate against such person.

(c) Accreditation; licensure; certification.—The Federal Government shall consider accredited, licensed, or certified for purposes of Federal law any person that would be accredited, licensed, or certified, respectively, for such purposes but for a determination against such person wholly or partially on the basis that the person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or that sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.

SEC. 4. Judicial relief.

(a) Cause of action.—A person may assert an actual or threatened violation of this Act as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding and obtain compensatory damages, injunctive relief, declaratory relief, or any other appropriate relief against the Federal Government. Standing to assert a claim or defense under this section shall be governed by the general rules of standing under Article III of the Constitution.

(b) Administrative remedies not required.—Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an action under this section may be commenced, and relief may be granted, in a United States district court without regard to whether the person commencing the action has sought or exhausted available administrative remedies.

(c) Attorneys’ fees.—Section 722(b) of the Revised Statutes (42 U.S.C. 1988(b)) is amended by inserting “the First Amendment Defense Act,” after “the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000,”.

(d) Authority of United States To Enforce This Act.—The Attorney General may bring an action for injunctive or declaratory relief against an independent establishment described in section 104(1) of title 5, United States Code, or an officer or employee of that independent establishment, to enforce compliance with this Act. Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to deny, impair, or otherwise affect any right or authority of the Attorney General, the United States, or any agency, officer, or employee of the United States, acting under any law other than this subsection, to institute or intervene in any proceeding.

SEC. 5. Rules of construction.

(a) Broad construction.—This Act shall be construed in favor of a broad protection of free exercise of religious beliefs and moral convictions, to the maximum extent permitted by the terms of this Act and the Constitution.

(b) No preemption, repeal, or narrow construction.—Nothing in this Act shall be construed to preempt State law, or repeal Federal law, that is equally or more protective of free exercise of religious beliefs and moral convictions. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to narrow the meaning or application of any State or Federal law protecting free exercise of religious beliefs and moral convictions. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prevent the Federal Government from providing, either directly or through a person not seeking protection under this Act, any benefit or service authorized under Federal law.

(c) Severability.—If any provision of this Act or any application of such provision to any person or circumstance is held to be unconstitutional, the remainder of this Act and the application of the provision to any other person or circumstance shall not be affected.

SEC. 6. Definitions.

In this Act:

(1) FEDERAL BENEFIT PROGRAM.—The term “Federal benefit program” has the meaning given that term in section 552a of title 5, United States Code.

(2) FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.—The term “Federal Government” includes each authority of any branch of the Government of the United States.

(3) PERSON.—The term “person” means a person as defined in section 1 of title 1, United States Code, and includes any such person regardless of religious affiliation or lack thereof, and regardless of for-profit or nonprofit status.

First Amendment Defense Act

Prohibits the federal government from taking discriminatory action against a person on the basis that such person believes or acts in accordance with a religious belief or moral conviction that: (1) marriage is or should be recognized as the union of one man and one woman, or (2) sexual relations are properly reserved to such a marriage.

Defines "discriminatory action" as any federal government action to discriminate against a person with such beliefs or convictions, including a federal government action to:

alter the federal tax treatment of, cause any tax, penalty, or payment to be assessed against, or deny, delay, or revoke certain tax exemptions of any such person;
disallow a deduction of any charitable contribution made to or by such person;
withhold, reduce, exclude, terminate, or otherwise deny any federal grant, contract, subcontract, cooperative agreement, loan, license, certification, accreditation, employment, or similar position or status from or to such person; or
withhold, reduce, exclude, terminate, or otherwise deny any benefit under a federal benefit program.

Requires the federal government to consider to be accredited, licensed, or certified for purposes of federal law any person who would be accredited, licensed, or certified for such purposes but for a determination that the person believes or acts in accordance with such a religious belief or moral conviction.

Permits a person to assert an actual or threatened violation of this Act as a claim or defense in a judicial or administrative proceeding and to obtain compensatory damages or other appropriate relief against the federal government.

Authorizes the Attorney General to bring an action to enforce this Act against the Government Accountability Office or an establishment in the executive branch, other than the U.S. Postal Service or the Postal Regulatory Commission, that is not an executive department, military department, or government corporation.

Defines "person" as any person regardless of religious affiliation, including corporations and other entities regardless of for-profit or nonprofit status.



Featured stocks: Coffee Shoppe
For conservative debate: "Keeping it Real"
Game Changing stock $SHMP

Scroll down for more posts ▼

Top 10 Most Recent News Articles

Max Stock Expands with Strategic Logistics Center

Updated Category News Views 2

Expansion in Full Swing In a move that might get tongues wagging in the boardrooms across Israel, Max Stock Limited (TASE: MAXO) just signed a hefty lease for a logistics center in Ofakim. This isn't just a modest expansion—it's a jaw-dropper at about 45,000 square meters. We're talking about a major upgrade that'll beef up their logistical backbone as they continue...

Continue Reading
PROCEPT Faces Legal Storm Over Sales Practices Missteps

Updated Category News Views 1

Investors Take Aim: A Legal Showdown on the Horizon There's a brewing storm over at PROCEPT BioRobotics—ticker NASDAQ:PRCT if you're tracking. These folks are knee-deep in a securities class action lawsuit from investors who’ve taken a financial wallop. The lawsuits are triggered by allegations of shady sales techniques that artificially bumped up their unit sales...

Continue Reading
Rodeo Dental Gears Up for National Growth Surge

Updated Category News Views 2

Rodeo Dental's Leadership Shuffle When you're talking about upping the ante in the dental world, you can't ignore the recent shake-up at Rodeo Dental & Orthodontics. They've decided to retool their corner office lineup, and this is where the folks in suits meet the folks with the steady hands in teeth. Co-Founder Dr. Saam Zarrabi is stepping into an Executive Chairman...

Continue Reading
Ohio's Visionary Leadership Honored with Prestigious Award

Updated Category News Views 2

Award for Exceptional Vision Care Leadership Ain't every day you see a politician scooping up awards for making a real difference in folks' lives. Yet here we are, tipping our hats to Ohio's Governor Mike DeWine, who's just been dubbed the honcho with the golden eye for children's vision care in the 12th annual Bonnie Strickland Champion for Children's Vision Award. Hats...

Continue Reading
Aesthetic M&A: Graper Harper's New Future Unfolds

Updated Category News Views 0

Charlotte's Premier Practice Takes a Strategic Leap Graper Harper Cosmetic Surgery's recent partnership with Aesthetic Partners might not be the headline grabbing Wall Street tale we've grown accustomed to, but it's certainly worth noting. When a practice like Graper Harper, recognized as a jewel in Charlotte's cosmetic landscape, teams up with a player like Aesthetic...

Continue Reading
Pentair Faces Class Action Over Fraud Allegations

Updated Category News Views 1

Catastrophe Strikes Pentair Ah, the sweet sound of a lawsuit hammering down on Wall Street—a routine part of corporate life for some of the biggest players in the game. This time, the bell tolls for Pentair plc, and it ain't pretty, folks. News just dropped that investors in New York Stock Exchange: PNR are staring down a newly expanded securities fraud class action...

Continue Reading
Nonprofit Option Rises for Specialty Physicians

Updated Category News Views 1

Reimaging Choices for Specialty Physicians In the whirlwind of healthcare, specialty physicians often find themselves between a rock and a hard place. The traditional paths are either hug a major health system or auction off to private equity, each option chaining them to systems more interested in the balance sheet than in patient care. But now, a third door opens. One...

Continue Reading
EzCheckPrinting Boosts Remote Check Solutions Cost-Effectively

Updated Category News Views 2

Navigating the Check Printing Landscape Let's dive right into the changing realities of the workspace. With remote work becoming the new standard, small businesses are juggling tighter budgets while trying to maintain smooth financial operations. It's a hard game, but here is where Halfpricesoft.com rolls out their newly upgraded multi-user ezCheckPrinting software,...

Continue Reading
FirstEnergy's Bold Move: Dormo Joins to Boost Power

Updated Category News Views 2

Changing the Game in Power Generation In the ever-shifting landscape of power generation, having a seasoned player at the helm can be the difference between stagnation and growth. FirstEnergy Corp. (NYSE:FE) has tapped Jon Dormo as its Vice President of Generation Project Development. The mission? Overhaul and expand projects to meet the increasing demands for...

Continue Reading
Mental Health Lab Aims to Boost Workforce Resilience

Updated Category News Views 6

Redefining Workforce Mental Health It’s about time someone shook up how we tackle workforce mental health. Enter Project Healthy Minds and their newly minted Workforce Lab, roping in some of the big dogs like Acast, KPMG, and L'Oréal USA. They've tagged Harvard Business School gurus to churn out data on what helps—or harms—workplace sanity. Finally, a chance to put...

Continue Reading

Top 5 Most Recently Viewed Articles

Exploring Japan's Mobile Phone Insurance Market Dynamics

Updated Category News Views 131

Japan's Expanding Mobile Phone Insurance Sector The mobile phone insurance market in Japan is on a remarkable growth path, set to exceed USD 9,934.20 million by 2032. Currently, the market is valued at USD 3,676.54 million and is projected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 12.37% from 2024 to 2032. This trend highlights consumers' increasing awareness...

Continue Reading
Humanetics Develops Revolutionary Drug for Radiation Protection

Updated Category News Views 46

Humanetics Corporation's Commitment to Innovation Humanetics Corporation is significantly advancing its mission in the realm of medical countermeasures with the recent publication of critical findings from two studies centered around its innovative drug, BIO 300. This groundbreaking drug offers a promising approach to combat acute radiation syndrome (ARS), a condition...

Continue Reading
Rubis Announces New Leadership and Board Enhancements

Updated Category News Views 182

Rubis Announces New Leadership and Board Enhancements In a significant move to enhance its governance structure, Rubis has announced the proposal for the appointment of two new Managing Partners. This initiative reflects the company's commitment to ensuring a smooth succession as it prepares for the future. The appointments are under the supervision of the current...

Continue Reading
EQT Exeter Expands European Logistics Footprint with Acquisition

Updated Category News Views 88

EQT Exeter Expands European Logistics Footprint EQT Exeter, a prominent player in the global real estate investment sector, has recently made headlines with its exciting acquisition of four logistics properties in Germany. This strategic move demonstrates the company's commitment to expanding its portfolio in key distribution locations throughout Europe. Key Features of...

Continue Reading
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. Faces Investigation Over Misleading Claims

Updated Category News Views 144

Understanding the Current Situation at Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE: CLF) is an important player in the steel industry, and recent developments have raised significant concern among its investors. This story unfolds as the Rosen Law Firm reveals ongoing investigations amid allegations that the company may have provided misleading business information,...

Continue Reading