As Pope Makes New Cardinals, Rift Widens with Conservatives
Pope Francis created 17 new cardinals Saturday in the midst of an intensifying confrontation with conservative cardinals over perceived doctrinal ambiguities in the Pope’s teaching.
In September, four leading cardinals wrote a private letter to Pope Francis asking him to clarify five serious doctrinal questions proceeding from his 2016 apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia (The Joy of Love). The questions concerned Holy Communion for the divorced and remarried, the indissolubility of marriage, and the proper role of conscience.
In their letter, the Cardinals—Raymond Burke, Carlo Caffarra, Walter Brandmüller and Joachim Meisner—asked the Pope whether certain specific Church teachings about Communion and the moral law are still valid.
When the Pope failed to reply to the Cardinals’ letter, they proceeded to publish it online on Nov. 14, hoping to elicit a response. The next day, Cardinal Raymond Burke, the former head of the Vatican’s Supreme Court and an expert in Canon Law, said in an interview that if Pope Francis does not clarify serious doctrinal doubts arising from Amoris Laetitia, the Cardinals will be forced to initiate “a formal act of correction of a serious error.”
If there is no response to these questions, Burke said, “then I would say that it would be a question of taking a formal act of correction of a serious error.”
On Thursday, Pope Francis responded obliquely to the four cardinals through an interview of his own with the Italian Catholic daily, L’Avvenire:
Some people – I am thinking of certain replies to Amoris laetitia – continue to not understand. Everything has to be black or white, even though it is in the course of life that we must discern. The [Second Vatican] Council told us this, but historians tell us that it takes a century for the body of the Church to assimilate a council fully, so we are only halfway there.
In what some have interpreted as a censure of the four cardinals, the Pope went on to say that sometimes people criticize in order “to justify a pre-formed position.”
“These are insincere, and come from a malicious spirit to incite division. You see right away that certain forms of legalism are born of a deficiency, from a desire to hide one’s sad dissatisfactions behind a shell,” he said.
Francis also said that “certain ways of contrasting ‘doctrinal questions’ with ‘questions of pastoral charity’ are not evangelical and create confusion.”
One way or another, the Cardinals’ insistence seems to have gotten under the Pope’s skin. In an interview with EWTN, Vatican journalist Edward Pentin said that sources within the Pope’s Santa Marta residence told him that the Pope is “boiling with rage” over the confrontation.
In this weekend’s events surrounding the making of new cardinals, called a “consistory,” Francis cancelled the usual meeting where cardinals raise important issues of concern. Some have speculated publicly that this move may very well have been a “tactic” on the part of the Pope to avoid having the questions about Amoris Laetitia “presented to him in person.”
Among the 17 new cardinals, Pope Francis chose two Americans as well as the Irish-born archbishop of Dallas, Kevin Farrell. Sidelining known conservatives from important dioceses, Francis bestowed the “red hat” on the recently appointed progressive archbishop of Chicago, Blaise Cupich, as well as Archbishop William Tobin of Indianapolis, who famously clashed with Vice President-elect Mike Pence over the idea of welcoming Syrian refugees into the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.
Veteran Vatican analyst John Allen noted that with his new appointments, Pope Francis had engineered a “seismic shift” in the Catholic hierarchy in the United States, and by naming just progressives, “Francis was making a statement about the direction in which he wants the American church to go.”
For their part, the U.S. Bishops responded earlier this week by electing two staunch conservatives to the top posts in the Bishops’ Conference (USCCB).
In what was widely viewed as pushback against the Pope’s progressive picks, the bishops chose Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, archbishop of Galveston-Houston and a known conservative, as president of the USCCB. DiNardo was one of 13 cardinals to sign a letter to Pope Francis in October 2015 raising several objections about left-wing manipulation of the controversial synod on marriage and family life.
As Vice President of the Conference, the bishops elected another conservative, Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez, a member of Opus Dei. Together with Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia, Gomez was passed over by Pope Francis in the recent selection of new U.S. cardinals, despite his impressive résumé and the importance of Los Angeles as an archdiocese.
Pope Francis created 17 new cardinals Saturday in the midst of an intensifying confrontation with conservative cardinals over perceived doctrinal ambiguities in the Pope’s teaching.
In September, four leading cardinals wrote a private letter to Pope Francis asking him to clarify five serious doctrinal questions proceeding from his 2016 apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia (The Joy of Love). The questions concerned Holy Communion for the divorced and remarried, the indissolubility of marriage, and the proper role of conscience.
In their letter, the Cardinals—Raymond Burke, Carlo Caffarra, Walter Brandmüller and Joachim Meisner—asked the Pope whether certain specific Church teachings about Communion and the moral law are still valid.
When the Pope failed to reply to the Cardinals’ letter, they proceeded to publish it online on Nov. 14, hoping to elicit a response. The next day, Cardinal Raymond Burke, the former head of the Vatican’s Supreme Court and an expert in Canon Law, said in an interview that if Pope Francis does not clarify serious doctrinal doubts arising from Amoris Laetitia, the Cardinals will be forced to initiate “a formal act of correction of a serious error.”
If there is no response to these questions, Burke said, “then I would say that it would be a question of taking a formal act of correction of a serious error.”
On Thursday, Pope Francis responded obliquely to the four cardinals through an interview of his own with the Italian Catholic daily, L’Avvenire:
Some people – I am thinking of certain replies to Amoris laetitia – continue to not understand. Everything has to be black or white, even though it is in the course of life that we must discern. The [Second Vatican] Council told us this, but historians tell us that it takes a century for the body of the Church to assimilate a council fully, so we are only halfway there.
In what some have interpreted as a censure of the four cardinals, the Pope went on to say that sometimes people criticize in order “to justify a pre-formed position.”
“These are insincere, and come from a malicious spirit to incite division. You see right away that certain forms of legalism are born of a deficiency, from a desire to hide one’s sad dissatisfactions behind a shell,” he said.
Francis also said that “certain ways of contrasting ‘doctrinal questions’ with ‘questions of pastoral charity’ are not evangelical and create confusion.”
One way or another, the Cardinals’ insistence seems to have gotten under the Pope’s skin. In an interview with EWTN, Vatican journalist Edward Pentin said that sources within the Pope’s Santa Marta residence told him that the Pope is “boiling with rage” over the confrontation.
In this weekend’s events surrounding the making of new cardinals, called a “consistory,” Francis cancelled the usual meeting where cardinals raise important issues of concern. Some have speculated publicly that this move may very well have been a “tactic” on the part of the Pope to avoid having the questions about Amoris Laetitia “presented to him in person.”
Among the 17 new cardinals, Pope Francis chose two Americans as well as the Irish-born archbishop of Dallas, Kevin Farrell. Sidelining known conservatives from important dioceses, Francis bestowed the “red hat” on the recently appointed progressive archbishop of Chicago, Blaise Cupich, as well as Archbishop William Tobin of Indianapolis, who famously clashed with Vice President-elect Mike Pence over the idea of welcoming Syrian refugees into the Archdiocese of Indianapolis.
Veteran Vatican analyst John Allen noted that with his new appointments, Pope Francis had engineered a “seismic shift” in the Catholic hierarchy in the United States, and by naming just progressives, “Francis was making a statement about the direction in which he wants the American church to go.”
For their part, the U.S. Bishops responded earlier this week by electing two staunch conservatives to the top posts in the Bishops’ Conference (USCCB).
In what was widely viewed as pushback against the Pope’s progressive picks, the bishops chose Cardinal Daniel DiNardo, archbishop of Galveston-Houston and a known conservative, as president of the USCCB. DiNardo was one of 13 cardinals to sign a letter to Pope Francis in October 2015 raising several objections about left-wing manipulation of the controversial synod on marriage and family life.
As Vice President of the Conference, the bishops elected another conservative, Los Angeles Archbishop José Gomez, a member of Opus Dei. Together with Archbishop Charles Chaput of Philadelphia, Gomez was passed over by Pope Francis in the recent selection of new U.S. cardinals, despite his impressive résumé and the importance of Los Angeles as an archdiocese.
