it's amazing what deliberately eludes .. ;) i see that

it's amazing what deliberately eludes ..

i see that one serial stalker has posting privileges *there* yet again .. hmmm
how very non surprising since they were revoked *here*

but i digress

what is astounding is what has been missed at every turn ..

P2O's flagship (processor number 3) came to pass in the summer of 2013

mere weeks later .. P2O (the company) was wrested back from serial bad actors
(as the SEC euphemistically refers to FILTH)

in his first statement (August 2013) .. current CEO had a one liner about
P2O selling their processors

6 weeks after that .. current CEO infused $Millions to clean up *mess* left behind
by those who *exploited* for their own financial benefit at the expense of every
other actual P2O investor

that was 9.30.13 ..

it is worth noting the 2 *audio* CCs' held in both Nov (Q) and Dec 2013 (AGM)

the confidence exuded by both the company's founder and P2O's current CEO
are worth noting .. because it's clear (even without ECO's LLC creation of
the first Q of 2014) the interest in P2O's disruptive tech was clearly established


in 2014 .. ECO was created to facilitate P2O sales .. most likely alongside OBG

P2O's mgmt gave time (some can argue too much .. others could argue too little)
for ECO to finalize P2O's first sale

note that with ECO's agreement termination that P2O's CEO noted this:

Quote:

As previously reported, the Company Plastic2Oil, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into four related agreements with EcoNavigation, LLC (“EcoNavigation”) in connection with the supply of plastic-to-oil, or P2O, processors by the Company to EcoNavigation. As of January 27, 2016, such agreements expired and were not renewed by the parties, however, the parties continue to pursue joint opportunities for the sale of processors to third parties.

it's pretty clear that one of the 2 southern entities is P2O's first sale

note what RH referenced re: MOU (DA is expected on or b4 11.25.16)

Quote:

On August 26, 2016, Plastic2Oil, Inc., finalized a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with a Southern U.S. company regarding potential licensing of the company’s technology and a potential sale of units.

anyone ask themselves how long that deal was being worked?

hedgie trolls .. crew/s minions .. canned ex employee (with an ax to grind against
the CEO who fired his ass .. all have one thing in common)

their DD *hinges* on their financial *stake* from years ago .. that is why
P2O's SURVIVAL and first sale consummated (on the books) presents such
a dilemma

remember folks ..

elastic trades = abusive trades (aka NSS)

hidden trades = resets (rolling constantly)

hedgies (and their trolls who populate SMBs at their non retail bosses' dictates)
are used to controlling outcomes .. meaning they never cover because normally
after working the cycle of money on any targeted stock/company .. they can
issue the kill order and the company is taken no bid

at every stage original CE .. screwed up .. they never did the DD on who *held*
and had company's founder gone the traditional route of funding .. this board wouldn't
even have one post per month .. because company would not *imo* have SURVIVED to the 8+ year level

that is why it is so telling about the quality (and lack there of) of PTOI's tape
of trades .. and why in this specific case .. documentation is this FILTHs'
achilles' heel

CEs' (NON RETAIL) have few options remaining .. P2O on the other hand
provided they execute what they've filed .. have *numerous* options that can be
utilized

which is never *discussed or speculated* about

i do get why after all these years (let's not discount efforts in place from 2009 to today
and the effect they would have to this day) some focus only on the PPS .. but that
is (pardon the pun) such a short sighted take on P2O's potential (both short and long term)

very little surprises me .. but i have to say the FORM 4 (CFO) filed this week
did ... and i like the indication and confidence displayed by its filing

here's to what P2O files next ..

4kids