Request for follow up from posters on this board.
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 10/28/2016 11:24:23 AM
Request for follow up from posters on this board.
If you want this board to remain available for active debate, constructive criticism, and not to turn into what we generally seem to agree is a useless (to us as investors) forum as iLie - I would like you to specifically follow up with your concerns and suggestions to the moderators of this board with respect to the post below:
Posted On: 10/27/2016 9:35:41 AM
Posted By: mag1
Re: thesmalls #14436
RMHB Stock Message Board
smalls....I'm telling You.......Cool It or That's IT.......
(5)
(1)
Once again - mag1 has directly threatened me. With what I do not know but the implied threat that something will happen is intentional. Besides being a direct violation of TOU of this board/site, it becomes more significant as he is a board moderator. Whether you agree with my position or not with respect to IR and/or agree with his defending of them or not - trying to stifle the debate through removing posts, blocking or banning users, or trying to strong arm a particular narrative is what we collectively left iLie for to come here. If we let one poster that is a moderator do so here - is it really any different?
Further, how does that make the next poster feel when wanting to question IR or the validity of a poster's post? Will they be more inclined or less inclined to post under threat of censure or worse? That is the overriding presumption with having a TOU to allow for free debate. Further, that is EXACTLY what the moderators are there to ensure.
If you feel the same, I would suggest you send a PM to the remaining moderators expressing your concerns. I have done so (in more specific detail) and have asked for the specific post to be removed and to have mag1 removed as a moderator. I have not asked that he be banned - just removed as a moderator due to his repeated abuse of the position and the road that type of behavior will lead this board down. You are more than welcome to respond in the public forum but I certainly understand why some (many?) might be hesitant to do so.
If you want this board to remain available for active debate, constructive criticism, and not to turn into what we generally seem to agree is a useless (to us as investors) forum as iLie - I would like you to specifically follow up with your concerns and suggestions to the moderators of this board with respect to the post below:
Posted On: 10/27/2016 9:35:41 AM
Posted By: mag1
Re: thesmalls #14436
RMHB Stock Message Board
smalls....I'm telling You.......Cool It or That's IT.......
(5)
(1)
Once again - mag1 has directly threatened me. With what I do not know but the implied threat that something will happen is intentional. Besides being a direct violation of TOU of this board/site, it becomes more significant as he is a board moderator. Whether you agree with my position or not with respect to IR and/or agree with his defending of them or not - trying to stifle the debate through removing posts, blocking or banning users, or trying to strong arm a particular narrative is what we collectively left iLie for to come here. If we let one poster that is a moderator do so here - is it really any different?
Further, how does that make the next poster feel when wanting to question IR or the validity of a poster's post? Will they be more inclined or less inclined to post under threat of censure or worse? That is the overriding presumption with having a TOU to allow for free debate. Further, that is EXACTLY what the moderators are there to ensure.
If you feel the same, I would suggest you send a PM to the remaining moderators expressing your concerns. I have done so (in more specific detail) and have asked for the specific post to be removed and to have mag1 removed as a moderator. I have not asked that he be banned - just removed as a moderator due to his repeated abuse of the position and the road that type of behavior will lead this board down. You are more than welcome to respond in the public forum but I certainly understand why some (many?) might be hesitant to do so.
(6)
(4)