I believe the premise of this board is to maintain
Post# of 96892
Posted On: 10/27/2016 9:53:10 AM
I believe the premise of this board is to maintain a relatively objective forum in a positive light.
It is the mods responsibility to maintain that environment because the majority of posters want that.
We all know that things do not seem rosy all the time with NTEK. It's stated here all the time.
But when individuals exhibit behavior to move the core of the discussion in an extremely negative direction for whatever personal agenda the poster may have (which also happens to be the exact behavior a basher would use to infiltrate and try to change the sentiment of a group or completely destroy it), it's the MODs responsibility to bring the discussion back to what the sentiment of the forum is designed to represent.
Are mistakes made in deleting some posts ? Absolutely.
But IMO I would rather see those mistakes made to attempt to maintain the current sentiment of this group than to see this group de-evolve into the cesspool of negative sentiment, half truths and outright lies expressed in the other forums I've seen.
If you don't like the sentiment of this group you can always start another one on this sight that will cater to the needs of those seeking a more "objective" point of view.
There's always Shubs Shack, they seem like a pretty negative bunch over there....
Ah, but there is no one over there to negatively influence over there....I don't think anyone has posted there in a month.
And then, there's always the Facebook groups.
But since the folks with negative outlooks seem to have the most influence on those groups they have pretty much become ghost town except for the occasional cursory visits from shareholders in hopes of finding some useful information or n occasional bash to let people know "who is in charge"
People know the sentiment in this group.
Why do they come here to attempt to spread that negativity or to create their own version of "objectivity".
Because IMO it's the only group left that provides any kind of positive and fairly realistic outlook on the company.
Heaven forbid....we couldn't have that.....
again...JMHO...GLTA
It is the mods responsibility to maintain that environment because the majority of posters want that.
We all know that things do not seem rosy all the time with NTEK. It's stated here all the time.
But when individuals exhibit behavior to move the core of the discussion in an extremely negative direction for whatever personal agenda the poster may have (which also happens to be the exact behavior a basher would use to infiltrate and try to change the sentiment of a group or completely destroy it), it's the MODs responsibility to bring the discussion back to what the sentiment of the forum is designed to represent.
Are mistakes made in deleting some posts ? Absolutely.
But IMO I would rather see those mistakes made to attempt to maintain the current sentiment of this group than to see this group de-evolve into the cesspool of negative sentiment, half truths and outright lies expressed in the other forums I've seen.
If you don't like the sentiment of this group you can always start another one on this sight that will cater to the needs of those seeking a more "objective" point of view.
There's always Shubs Shack, they seem like a pretty negative bunch over there....
Ah, but there is no one over there to negatively influence over there....I don't think anyone has posted there in a month.
And then, there's always the Facebook groups.
But since the folks with negative outlooks seem to have the most influence on those groups they have pretty much become ghost town except for the occasional cursory visits from shareholders in hopes of finding some useful information or n occasional bash to let people know "who is in charge"
People know the sentiment in this group.
Why do they come here to attempt to spread that negativity or to create their own version of "objectivity".
Because IMO it's the only group left that provides any kind of positive and fairly realistic outlook on the company.
Heaven forbid....we couldn't have that.....
again...JMHO...GLTA
(9)
(0)