that is one of the key issues with IR:
"Sooner or later, everyone will be on Muse's sh!t list." any push back, follow up questions, requests for clarifications or anything that is perceived as the slightest slight and you get bounced from their rolls and directed to Bill. after of course they tell you to sell your shares and move on. i still dont see how alienating every, major, outside shareholder benefits the company in the short or long run? further, with their petty name calling and singling out individual shareholders, what does that say to remaining shareholders...? dont ask questions. dont cross us. or you maybe next. GREAT way to build rapport and trust. of course, when one goes down that path where ego tries to supplement competence - it often goes sideways.
still trying to decipher the barrage of tweets today. anyone care to expound on what they mean or what their intent was with respect to addressing the viability of owning shares in $TPAC vs trading MRVB picks...? are they saying buying TPAC today is or is not a good long term investment? more importantly - why are shareholder on here or any forum needing that type of clarification? it should be rather straight forward if trading at $0.0008 and they are standing behind a PPS of $0.01 in just a little over two months. seems like a no brainer. but then again, the market is not buying into one way or the other. vast majority of the action (what little there has been today) has again been on the sell side.
eventually IR/Muse may come to realize that shareholders can be a major asset in their own strategy. maybe the adversarial or condescending approach isnt the best suited for mutual goal achievement. maybe if their childish tweets and barely legible twitter rants were replaced with open dialogue with the full understanding that there IS going to be pushback (because that is what individual investors do to differentiate between dazzling with details and baffling with BS) then everyone would be on the same page and moving forward together. but then again, that was previously suggested and immediately mocked and criticized (not to mention blatantly lied about).
last point for the above - if IR is so glad to get those shares back - why dont they make a competitive offer to those shareholders who they want to sell? if they will be in such short supply - lock them up now before they get more expensive. if their PPS target is a lock - how about offering 1/2 or 1/3 of the target today?
ragz - you addressed briefly how the PPS gets to $0.01 by year end but you cited SLA that doesnt begin to 2017. even if they get production/revenues started in 2016 - what are payment terms where those monies could realistically hit TPACs balance sheet and be available for a buyback to shift supply/demand to move price forward? as daily average volume continues to drop - the amount the company can buy back each day declines as well.
guess we will know more tomorrow. will it be specific enough to bring in the new investors or stoke existing investors to resume buying? will it be enough to keep them buying or be just an out for those looking to leave on any sign of strength after the last 6 months of subterfuge?
"Sooner or later, everyone will be on Muse's sh!t list." any push back, follow up questions, requests for clarifications or anything that is perceived as the slightest slight and you get bounced from their rolls and directed to Bill. after of course they tell you to sell your shares and move on. i still dont see how alienating every, major, outside shareholder benefits the company in the short or long run? further, with their petty name calling and singling out individual shareholders, what does that say to remaining shareholders...? dont ask questions. dont cross us. or you maybe next. GREAT way to build rapport and trust. of course, when one goes down that path where ego tries to supplement competence - it often goes sideways.
still trying to decipher the barrage of tweets today. anyone care to expound on what they mean or what their intent was with respect to addressing the viability of owning shares in $TPAC vs trading MRVB picks...? are they saying buying TPAC today is or is not a good long term investment? more importantly - why are shareholder on here or any forum needing that type of clarification? it should be rather straight forward if trading at $0.0008 and they are standing behind a PPS of $0.01 in just a little over two months. seems like a no brainer. but then again, the market is not buying into one way or the other. vast majority of the action (what little there has been today) has again been on the sell side.
eventually IR/Muse may come to realize that shareholders can be a major asset in their own strategy. maybe the adversarial or condescending approach isnt the best suited for mutual goal achievement. maybe if their childish tweets and barely legible twitter rants were replaced with open dialogue with the full understanding that there IS going to be pushback (because that is what individual investors do to differentiate between dazzling with details and baffling with BS) then everyone would be on the same page and moving forward together. but then again, that was previously suggested and immediately mocked and criticized (not to mention blatantly lied about).
last point for the above - if IR is so glad to get those shares back - why dont they make a competitive offer to those shareholders who they want to sell? if they will be in such short supply - lock them up now before they get more expensive. if their PPS target is a lock - how about offering 1/2 or 1/3 of the target today?
ragz - you addressed briefly how the PPS gets to $0.01 by year end but you cited SLA that doesnt begin to 2017. even if they get production/revenues started in 2016 - what are payment terms where those monies could realistically hit TPACs balance sheet and be available for a buyback to shift supply/demand to move price forward? as daily average volume continues to drop - the amount the company can buy back each day declines as well.
guess we will know more tomorrow. will it be specific enough to bring in the new investors or stoke existing investors to resume buying? will it be enough to keep them buying or be just an out for those looking to leave on any sign of strength after the last 6 months of subterfuge?
4
2
