Bhawks do you think the no fly zones Hillary propo

Quote:

---

Bhawks do you think the no fly zones Hillary proposes will lead to shot down Russian fighters and a war with Russia?

---

Uh, no. "Thirteen Days " has been playing on cable lately. I think, as depicted in the movie, that Hillary will sit around a table that includes the head of the Joint Chiefs, and a 'grey eminence' or two, and they would go through the 'if we do this, they do what, then what do we do, what will they do?' scenarios.

Russia has not fought ANY wars lately against an opponent that can control airspace, period.

Do the Russian want to risk taking down an American AWACS or a relief plane carrying food and medicine? Does Russia really want to appear to be on the wrong side of protecting civilians?

I expect deliberation and not necessarily a decision to put up a 'no fly zone'.

And I don't see any need to do a preemptive nuclear strike where a conventional weapons attack will suffice. Against missiles on an adversary's launch pad, for example.

Quote:

---

Since you swallow the Russian election manipulation Hillary espouses would you agree a preemptive nuclear attack is the most sane response as one of Hillarys first action as prez?

---

I'm not 'swallowing' anything. It is the conclusion of both U.S intelligence and private cyber security firms that the Russians ARE behind the hacking. What do you have but your usual paranoia driven, fact-challenged assertions?

You rightys don't even see how badly this weak-ass stance by Trump and his apologists, vis-à-vis the Russians and their hacking, is hurting Trump.

Reagan is spinning in his grave over an iteration of the GOP that takes the side of the Russians against the U.S.

Rubio was right:

Quote:

---

Marco Rubio Warns GOP: We Could Be the Next Target for Hackers

The Florida senator and former presidential candidate warns fellow Republicans not to try to capitalize on the leaked DNC or Clinton campaign emails.

---