And while some journalists do give politicians mon
Post# of 65629
Quote:
And while some journalists do give politicians money, the vast majority do not.
$350,000 into the 'till'. Obviously an inconsequential amount.
So then we're left to the argument about 'bias'. And we need to bring Fox news and it's management, staff and reportage into the discussion.
Journalistically, if there are several sources and corroboration it's easy to discern. I've yet to see a story on cable news that did not include the disclaimer "we have not been able to confirm the accuracy of the accusers....." as it pertained to the 'bus tapes'.
On that basis, where do you see the most use of "incomplete and misleading information and innuendo to suggest improper financial ties and relationships where none exist."
Just because you don't LIKE the reporting of one news organization or another, doesn't mean that their reporting is necessarily biased.
This is a sideshow. Trump's statements and positions are fair game as are Clinton's. If he's more in the news because ....he's more in the news, that's on him. If he 'steps on stories' about Clinton, he's the one...stepping on stories about Clinton.
I'm seeing the Wikileaks releases being reported, they're are not being ignored. If conclusions about their accuracy or their import are not to your liking, then we're back to corroboration, sources and fact-based conclusions.
Trump is NOT losing due to biased reporting.