Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. User Boards ›
  4. Political Debate Board Message Board

And while some journalists do give politicians mon

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 65629
Posted On: 10/17/2016 3:53:59 PM
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: OMO #22887
Quote:
And while some journalists do give politicians money, the vast majority do not.



$350,000 into the 'till'. Obviously an inconsequential amount.

So then we're left to the argument about 'bias'. And we need to bring Fox news and it's management, staff and reportage into the discussion.

Journalistically, if there are several sources and corroboration it's easy to discern. I've yet to see a story on cable news that did not include the disclaimer "we have not been able to confirm the accuracy of the accusers....." as it pertained to the 'bus tapes'.

On that basis, where do you see the most use of "incomplete and misleading information and innuendo to suggest improper financial ties and relationships where none exist."

Just because you don't LIKE the reporting of one news organization or another, doesn't mean that their reporting is necessarily biased.

This is a sideshow. Trump's statements and positions are fair game as are Clinton's. If he's more in the news because ....he's more in the news, that's on him. If he 'steps on stories' about Clinton, he's the one...stepping on stories about Clinton.

I'm seeing the Wikileaks releases being reported, they're are not being ignored. If conclusions about their accuracy or their import are not to your liking, then we're back to corroboration, sources and fact-based conclusions.

Trump is NOT losing due to biased reporting.












(2)
(0)








Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us