"I don't know CG1 but, you keep talking about IR w
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 10/16/2016 9:35:26 PM
Re: kmmohr1960 #14086
"I don't know CG1 but, you keep talking about IR when you bought a stock that was over-valued and now you're trying to blame on someone else?"
apparently you dont know me either. your posts make no sense in light of my posts throughout the last two years.
was the stock overvalued at $0.0002? $0.0003? $0.0009? 0.005? based on revenues - one could argue it has no value period. however, one doesnt invest in emerging companies due to past revenues as they tend to be negligible or non existent. one invests in future potential and considers risk/reward of the company becoming profitable/viable accordingly.
i am not blaming anyone for my investment or DD. apparently you arent reading the entire posts (not surprising) or putting your own narrative to my posts.
apparently you dont know me either. your posts make no sense in light of my posts throughout the last two years.
was the stock overvalued at $0.0002? $0.0003? $0.0009? 0.005? based on revenues - one could argue it has no value period. however, one doesnt invest in emerging companies due to past revenues as they tend to be negligible or non existent. one invests in future potential and considers risk/reward of the company becoming profitable/viable accordingly.
i am not blaming anyone for my investment or DD. apparently you arent reading the entire posts (not surprising) or putting your own narrative to my posts.
(2)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼