Muse has said the pps of TPAC does not matter at t
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 10/14/2016 4:45:31 PM
Muse has said the pps of TPAC does not matter at this point in time. I have to believe that. Their focus is on the MRVB. This is the main focus of IR at this point in time. Period. TPAC pps will not be helped by hoping for news in the short term from contracts or anything else. Thats because that revenue won't show up until Q1 report is posted in the 2nd quarter of 2017. The MRVB will not be able to bail out the pps by buying back shares until the end of Q4 2016 or Q1 2017. But if you're expecting the buyback to get the pps to .01 you're living in lala land. If the pps is at .001 with approx 4 billion shares, buying back even half that amount without revenue reports will only increase the pps to double what it is now, that's .002. And you can forget about the $10M loan. Muse had originally talked about the $85M loan going into the MRVB and increasing the internal pps to .021. The $85M loan is out of the picture until after the election. The $10M loan will not be put into the MRVB. You cannot borrow funds for investment in the stock market. That's why the pps is at .0009 today. If you've looked at the MRVB, it's lost money on the YTD Realized Assets. The unrealized assets don't mean a thing until they've been sold. Yesterday, The Net G/L was at $123k, today it's at $120k. The only thing that matters is Net performance. And by the way, what was the original investment?
Transpacific Aerospace will do well as an aerospace parts making company. They've already got contracts established to the tune of $13.5M per year. And their SLA's and EIA contracts are icing on the cake. But the MRVB? I see funds invested to the tune of $123,000 but so far the YTD Net loss is around $2,800. It's an interesting idea but there's apparently no free lunch.
And by the way, I invested today in the stock du jour, UWTI, based on Muse's suggestion and suffered a net loss. I've seen others tout how much some of their stock picks have gained but all I can see is a net loss so far. And that's supposed to stabilize the pps of TPAC? So far it hasn't worked. It was at .0011 two days ago and now it's at .0009. That's a 19% drop when exactly the opposite was assured by Muse.
Transpacific Aerospace will do well as an aerospace parts making company. They've already got contracts established to the tune of $13.5M per year. And their SLA's and EIA contracts are icing on the cake. But the MRVB? I see funds invested to the tune of $123,000 but so far the YTD Net loss is around $2,800. It's an interesting idea but there's apparently no free lunch.
And by the way, I invested today in the stock du jour, UWTI, based on Muse's suggestion and suffered a net loss. I've seen others tout how much some of their stock picks have gained but all I can see is a net loss so far. And that's supposed to stabilize the pps of TPAC? So far it hasn't worked. It was at .0011 two days ago and now it's at .0009. That's a 19% drop when exactly the opposite was assured by Muse.
(5)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
JonnyBGood