Investors Hangout Stock Message Boards Logo
  • Mailbox
  • Favorites
  • Boards
    • The Hangout
    • NASDAQ
    • NYSE
    • OTC Markets
    • All Boards
  • Whats Hot!
    • Recent Activity
    • Most Viewed Boards
    • Most Viewed Posts
    • Most Posted
    • Most Followed
    • Top Boards
    • Newest Boards
    • Newest Members
  • Blog
    • Recent Blog Posts
    • Recently Updated
    • News
    • Stocks
    • Crypto
    • Investing
    • Business
    • Markets
    • Economy
    • Real Estate
    • Personal Finance
  • Market Movers
  • Interactive Charts
  • Login - Join Now FREE!
  1. Home ›
  2. Stock Message Boards ›
  3. User Boards ›
  4. Political Debate Board Message Board

We're talking past each other. Everything I've pos

Message Board Public Reply | Private Reply | Keep | Replies (0)                   Post New Msg
Edit Msg () | Previous | Next


Post# of 65629
Posted On: 10/06/2016 11:23:56 PM
Posted By: Bhawks
Re: OMO #21626
We're talking past each other. Everything I've posted on the subject asserted that supply side meant reducing taxes to stimulate economic activity. No dispute there.

Except it doesn't work, not without increasing deficits and as you read, WITHOUT assuring GDP growth much less creating jobs.

So your claims that supply side tax cuts 'enable' tax hikes is fairy dust economics, apparently the only kind you studied or believe in.

And your comparison of widget surpluses to a budget surplus is pure horse shit. If a Republican president produced a budget surplus they would crow from morning till dusk, 'fiscal sanity' and such.

Bush could have use that surplus to build infrastructure or use it to help to pay for the war and Medicare D.

At the very least he should have left the Clinton tax rates in place, no hikes, no cuts. He picked the absolute worst thing to do.

Your inability to admit that the Republican do anything wrong economically or otherwise is silly.

I'm going to go have to go back to posting the long association of Dem Presidents with greater job creation, lower unemployment and higher stock market valuations.

IFthat association were favorable to Republicans, the association would become causation, no ifs ands or buts. We both know it would.









(0)
(0)








Investors Hangout

Home

Mailbox

Message Boards

Favorites

Whats Hot

Blog

Settings

Privacy Policy

Terms and Conditions

Disclaimer

Contact Us

Whats Hot

Recent Activity

Most Viewed Boards

Most Viewed Posts

Most Posted Boards

Most Followed

Top Boards

Newest Boards

Newest Members

Investors Hangout Message Boards

Welcome To Investors Hangout

Stock Message Boards

American Stock Exchange (AMEX)

NASDAQ Stock Exchange (NASDAQ)

New York Stock Exchange (NYSE)

Penny Stocks - (OTC)

User Boards

The Hangout

Private

Global Markets

Australian Securities Exchange (ASX)

Euronext Amsterdam (AMS)

Euronext Brussels (BRU)

Euronext Lisbon (LIS)

Euronext Paris (PAR)

Foreign Exchange (FOREX)

Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX)

London Stock Exchange (LSE)

Milan Stock Exchange (MLSE)

New Zealand Exchange (NZX)

Singapore Stock Exchange (SGX)

Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX)

Contact Investors Hangout

Email Us

Follow Investors Hangout

Twitter

YouTube

Facebook

Market Data powered by QuoteMedia. Copyright © 2025. Data delayed 15 minutes unless otherwise indicated (view delay times for all exchanges).
Analyst Ratings & Earnings by Zacks. RT=Real-Time, EOD=End of Day, PD=Previous Day. Terms of Use.

© 2025 Copyright Investors Hangout, LLC All Rights Reserved.

Privacy Policy |Do Not Sell My Information | Terms & Conditions | Disclaimer | Help | Contact Us