what i find so telling is the *original interchang
Post# of 43066
Posted On: 10/04/2016 11:38:16 AM
Re: Capitalgain #33613
what i find so telling is the *original interchangeable crew* seems to have
literally been asleep at the wheel with the material events filed by P2O in August 2016
had they done the *DD* .. on the first infusion of $100,000 and subsequent
*realties* within the *connections* .. they wouldn't have wasted their *efforts*
in resetting PTOI to a new 52 week low via their *oft traded* 18500 *resetting*
March's *reset* of 019 to 018 (August) .. just a *day later* ..
i strongly suspect *original entity* recognizes what is en route re: P2O
founder's disruptive tech is eminently flexible and more than ready for *adoption* ..
and it is quite possible (because it cant be known till after the fact) that
*original CE* has an issue @ 5c vs the 10c .. i've noted for a few years now
but what will be *crippling* imo .. isn't just P2O's first sale .. but noted material
events (March 2016) via P2O's current CEO .. if implemented in parallel ..
couple that *reality* with what P2O has noted re: another *southern* state's
interest (30 processors) .. which *converted* imo allows maximum *financial* pain against this FILTH (NON RETAIL) ..
as most actual P2O investors recognize .. P2O (company) has multiple options
.. it's amazing how truly *inside the box* .. certain *CEs' thinking* remains re: P2O's future
first sale begets all sorts of *change* imo .. some obvious .. others imo not so
here's to what P2O files next
4kids
literally been asleep at the wheel with the material events filed by P2O in August 2016
had they done the *DD* .. on the first infusion of $100,000 and subsequent
*realties* within the *connections* .. they wouldn't have wasted their *efforts*
in resetting PTOI to a new 52 week low via their *oft traded* 18500 *resetting*
March's *reset* of 019 to 018 (August) .. just a *day later* ..
i strongly suspect *original entity* recognizes what is en route re: P2O
founder's disruptive tech is eminently flexible and more than ready for *adoption* ..
and it is quite possible (because it cant be known till after the fact) that
*original CE* has an issue @ 5c vs the 10c .. i've noted for a few years now
but what will be *crippling* imo .. isn't just P2O's first sale .. but noted material
events (March 2016) via P2O's current CEO .. if implemented in parallel ..
couple that *reality* with what P2O has noted re: another *southern* state's
interest (30 processors) .. which *converted* imo allows maximum *financial* pain against this FILTH (NON RETAIL) ..
as most actual P2O investors recognize .. P2O (company) has multiple options
.. it's amazing how truly *inside the box* .. certain *CEs' thinking* remains re: P2O's future
first sale begets all sorts of *change* imo .. some obvious .. others imo not so
here's to what P2O files next
4kids
(1)
(0)