what i find so telling is the *original interchang

what i find so telling is the *original interchangeable crew* seems to have
literally been asleep at the wheel with the material events filed by P2O in August 2016

had they done the *DD* .. on the first infusion of $100,000 and subsequent
*realties* within the *connections* .. they wouldn't have wasted their *efforts*
in resetting PTOI to a new 52 week low via their *oft traded* 18500 *resetting*
March's *reset* of 019 to 018 (August) .. just a *day later* ..

i strongly suspect *original entity* recognizes what is en route re: P2O
founder's disruptive tech is eminently flexible and more than ready for *adoption* ..

and it is quite possible (because it cant be known till after the fact) that
*original CE* has an issue @ 5c vs the 10c .. i've noted for a few years now

but what will be *crippling* imo .. isn't just P2O's first sale .. but noted material
events (March 2016) via P2O's current CEO .. if implemented in parallel ..

couple that *reality* with what P2O has noted re: another *southern* state's
interest (30 processors) .. which *converted* imo allows maximum *financial* pain against this FILTH (NON RETAIL) ..

as most actual P2O investors recognize .. P2O (company) has multiple options
.. it's amazing how truly *inside the box* .. certain *CEs' thinking* remains re: P2O's future

first sale begets all sorts of *change* imo .. some obvious .. others imo not so

here's to what P2O files next

4kids