No - thats not the problem. Not the problem at all
Post# of 22940
Posted On: 10/03/2016 11:21:32 PM
Re: Ragz2Richez #13772
No - thats not the problem. Not the problem at all...
"that's the problem you see. trade as you see fit but don't hate on the company when their goals aren't as short sided as your investment strategy. "
If my investment was that short sighted - i would have cashed out on the run to 74 with around $160-190K in profits depending on when I executed sells as momentum waned. I wohkd have done that with the confident assumption that I would be able to get back in significantly lower as the company was still roughly 3 to 4 quarters to meaningful revenues at the time. My time horizon has been and currently remains signifcantly longer.
"that's the problem you see. trade as you see fit but don't hate on the company when their goals aren't as short sided as your investment strategy. "
If my investment was that short sighted - i would have cashed out on the run to 74 with around $160-190K in profits depending on when I executed sells as momentum waned. I wohkd have done that with the confident assumption that I would be able to get back in significantly lower as the company was still roughly 3 to 4 quarters to meaningful revenues at the time. My time horizon has been and currently remains signifcantly longer.
(4)
(0)Trans-Pacific Aerospace (TPAC) Stock Research Links
Scroll down for more posts ▼