Neither of those, of course. What are you, a misog
Post# of 65629
Are you so emotionally constricted that you actually believe that?
Do you Live in a community where open bigotry like your own thrives or do you conceal that bigotry, only feeling comfortable enough to keyboard commando your bigotries here?
Here's one opinion. it argues that tax hikes AND spending cuts reduce budget deficits and do not hinder job growth, which is exactly what has happened under Obama.
Maybe you can point to an example where sustained tax cuts, pre entitlement growth, created sustained job growth without eventually running up deficits?
St. Ronnie ended up with more tax hikes than cuts after his defense budget ran up the budget deficits. And JFK's tax cut was 'pre-entitlement', not counting a much more manageable SS population.
Do you think that Trump could 'rebuild' the military and provide a massive infrastructure Bill, as he has promised to do, with his proposed tax cuts?
Or, as more likely, will he say "people like me can afford to pay more taxes. We can't do it folks, we can't build a military so powerful no one will mess with us AND build those world class airports, bridges and roads, without paying for it.
Quote:
Said Gus Faucher, director of macroeconomics with Moody's economy.com: "I think he (Obama) is making the point that higher tax rates, at least at the levels under President Clinton, are compatible with strong economic growth, and the evidence is clear on that."
"You can argue that one reason we had strong growth in the 1990s is that Bush I and Clinton reduced the deficit (cut spending and raised taxes), bringing down budget deficits," Faucher said. "This, in turn, lowered long-term borrowing costs and made more capital available to the private sector.
The strong growth then helped bring down the deficit further, and eventually we got surpluses. I think the fiscal discipline of Bush I and Clinton was a reason for the strong growth in the 1990s."