I'm not here to represent the company, I'm just a
Post# of 7802
Posted On: 09/27/2016 10:58:44 AM
I'm not here to represent the company, I'm just a shareholder. But I don't see SFRX trying to create a myth, the myth has grown on its own from frustrated shareholders tired of your BS and doing their best to figure out your obsession.
SFRX will prove itself, I'm not worried about that. Kyle hasn't stuck with this for 8 or 9 years without a salary to quit or give up now. I'm pretty sure reports of "Nothing" being found of the target vessel are wrong. Are they using the Iron Maiden to dive right now? Are there repairs being made to the IM? If they have not used the IM on area 1 yet, how deep can they dive with the equipment they have? How long will it take till they are using the IM? There are a lot of questions that could be answered with a phone call to the company. You might jump to the conclusion with answers that fits the angle you want to promote. That's one strategy.
You are the only one saying they lied other than Volentine. That does not make them a liar. That just means you are calling them one. A big difference.
Maybe the 3 item agreement was verbal so there is no "proof." Maybe you know this and continue to ask for something that does not exist. Maybe it was another archaeologist that found the coins, obviously not Sinclair since he has denied it. But they never said it was Sinclair, just an archaeologist. Maybe you can send an email to Dr. De Bry and ask him. Are there other stories of people finding coins in the area that local people would know about?
These are not questions and answers I'm all that concerned about as there are scenarios that answer them if you don't look at it with a negative expectation. I prefer to look at the past actions that are provable. He did get a permit on Juno, he did get a permit for area 2 and now area 1, he has worked hard for a number of years. "Related parties" and other parties have bought shares via PP and are holding them, not even converting. Current crew members are hard workers with military experience, structure and dedication. And they are shareholders.
There are a lot of very obvious reasons why this is going to succeed in a big way without knowing whether the "3 item" agreement was written or verbal. Kyle will be back in town soon. It is my hope that the past progress will continue to its ultimate conclusion. Or maybe it is now, the crew does require Kyle to be on the boat to do their jobs. I think most importantly, whatever treasure is found first, it is just that, the FIRST. Each subsequent find and each new wreck will add to the success of SFRX as well as the share price.
I'm sure you'll spend a greater part of the day with a dissertation parsing my wording in an effort to discredit any positive thing I've said but I really don't care. You are just spinning your wheels at this point.
SFRX will prove itself, I'm not worried about that. Kyle hasn't stuck with this for 8 or 9 years without a salary to quit or give up now. I'm pretty sure reports of "Nothing" being found of the target vessel are wrong. Are they using the Iron Maiden to dive right now? Are there repairs being made to the IM? If they have not used the IM on area 1 yet, how deep can they dive with the equipment they have? How long will it take till they are using the IM? There are a lot of questions that could be answered with a phone call to the company. You might jump to the conclusion with answers that fits the angle you want to promote. That's one strategy.
You are the only one saying they lied other than Volentine. That does not make them a liar. That just means you are calling them one. A big difference.
Maybe the 3 item agreement was verbal so there is no "proof." Maybe you know this and continue to ask for something that does not exist. Maybe it was another archaeologist that found the coins, obviously not Sinclair since he has denied it. But they never said it was Sinclair, just an archaeologist. Maybe you can send an email to Dr. De Bry and ask him. Are there other stories of people finding coins in the area that local people would know about?
These are not questions and answers I'm all that concerned about as there are scenarios that answer them if you don't look at it with a negative expectation. I prefer to look at the past actions that are provable. He did get a permit on Juno, he did get a permit for area 2 and now area 1, he has worked hard for a number of years. "Related parties" and other parties have bought shares via PP and are holding them, not even converting. Current crew members are hard workers with military experience, structure and dedication. And they are shareholders.
There are a lot of very obvious reasons why this is going to succeed in a big way without knowing whether the "3 item" agreement was written or verbal. Kyle will be back in town soon. It is my hope that the past progress will continue to its ultimate conclusion. Or maybe it is now, the crew does require Kyle to be on the boat to do their jobs. I think most importantly, whatever treasure is found first, it is just that, the FIRST. Each subsequent find and each new wreck will add to the success of SFRX as well as the share price.
I'm sure you'll spend a greater part of the day with a dissertation parsing my wording in an effort to discredit any positive thing I've said but I really don't care. You are just spinning your wheels at this point.
(2)
(0)