When NNLX talks about a new website the initial mi
Post# of 9144
Posted On: 09/26/2016 10:16:56 PM
When NNLX talks about a new website the initial mimimal assumption is information will be updated because updates have been posted over time even on the current website
and it would be logical to assume new sections devoted to new info would be added because the current website is still useful for providing updates
it is illogical to assume that a new website would not meet either of these goals-why would a cost conscious company do that-they wouldnt
so the assumption that NNLX would spend dollars for fluff is ridiculous
Naysayers have ignored past PR's etc which indicate big things are happening in negotiations with one or more top companies,not to mention govt agencies
and I've provided typical guidelines re how long it takes to finish jv etc type arrangements
so I wouldnt be surprised if that would be one of the purposes of a new website
but shorters etc have ignored these things and every time more evidence of progress comes the usual litany of distractions/ rehashed attacks occurs to purposefully take peoples eyes off the progress
thats currently the case also-there was/is a tremendous peer review publication in progress posted as noted by Mach and Mitstevfel etc-and since then there has been the usual magicians trick/ barrage of distractions by the usual suspects to make people forget the progress indicated by such publication-
and it would be logical to assume new sections devoted to new info would be added because the current website is still useful for providing updates
it is illogical to assume that a new website would not meet either of these goals-why would a cost conscious company do that-they wouldnt
so the assumption that NNLX would spend dollars for fluff is ridiculous
Naysayers have ignored past PR's etc which indicate big things are happening in negotiations with one or more top companies,not to mention govt agencies
and I've provided typical guidelines re how long it takes to finish jv etc type arrangements
so I wouldnt be surprised if that would be one of the purposes of a new website
but shorters etc have ignored these things and every time more evidence of progress comes the usual litany of distractions/ rehashed attacks occurs to purposefully take peoples eyes off the progress
thats currently the case also-there was/is a tremendous peer review publication in progress posted as noted by Mach and Mitstevfel etc-and since then there has been the usual magicians trick/ barrage of distractions by the usual suspects to make people forget the progress indicated by such publication-
(8)
(0)